From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay1.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.131]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Pp32B-0003of-Rd for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 19:20:28 +0100 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1Pp314-0007mn-C5 from Tom_Rini@mentor.com for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 10:19:18 -0800 Received: from na2-mail.mgc.mentorg.com ([134.86.114.213]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 14 Feb 2011 10:19:18 -0800 Received: from [172.30.80.148] ([172.30.80.148]) by na2-mail.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:19:17 -0700 Message-ID: <4D59721B.6060103@mentor.com> Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:19:07 -0700 From: Tom Rini Organization: Mentor Graphics Corporation User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1297606132-19861-1-git-send-email-filip.zyzniewski@gmail.com> <4D59677E.2040004@mentor.com> <1297705231.2178.104.camel@phil-desktop> In-Reply-To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Feb 2011 18:19:17.0320 (UTC) FILETIME=[B1021480:01CBCC73] Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux-firmware: split into bus specific packages. X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 18:20:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/14/2011 11:10 AM, Filip Zyzniewski wrote: > On 2/14/11, Phil Blundell wrote: >> Yeah, agreed. Or even a split down to individual devices/drivers since >> each of the Ralink firmware binaries is quite large in itself. > > Yeah, I agree it is a good idea, it just isn't needed for us. > > So could this be done in two steps: > 1) this patch (by me) - split into buses; > 2) second patch (by whoever needs this) - furtherly split bus packages > by devices? I think that's fine. See my other email just now and we'll push v2, assuming I'm remembering how upgrades work, right :) -- Tom Rini Mentor Graphics Corporation