From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.geekisp.com ([216.168.135.169] helo=starfish.geekisp.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ppjcs-00067e-5u for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:49:10 +0100 Received: (qmail 21348 invoked by uid 1003); 16 Feb 2011 15:47:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.167?) (philip@opensdr.com@74.107.167.114) by mail.geekisp.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 16 Feb 2011 15:47:54 -0000 Message-ID: <4D5BF1A9.5040809@balister.org> Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:47:53 -0500 From: Philip Balister User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-members@lists.openembedded.org References: <1297794731.4945.312.camel@rex> In-Reply-To: Cc: tsc , Richard Purdie , openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: OE TSC Meeting 2011/02/14 Minutes X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 15:49:10 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/16/2011 10:05 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > Richard, > > Thanks for the excellent minutes. > > There are two things I would like to mention though, wrt this comment: > >> (21:13:55) _koen_: if people really wanted to be involved, they should have stepped up > > 1. The board never asked for people to step up. > 2. I have informed the board on Feb 1 by email that I was available. > Literally quoting: "If desired by the board I am available to > participate in the interim > TSC". As such I feel I have stepped up. Unfortunately my email has > apparently been ignored by the board. That is: no action has been > taken based upon it and I never got a reply. > > Just want to avoid the impression that I (and perhaps others) were not > willing to get involved. Before this gets any further, the email Frans is referring to was sent to the board. It was a long email and the line he is referring was after my patience reading email expired (note, in my case, the email was received during travel and I was reading email fast). Florian, Graeme, and myself met at FOSDEM to make a decision on the TSC situation. We had 5 strong candidates who had publically shown interest. The meeting location was outside a building, without access to a computer, so we could not review Frans' email. We already had one too many candidates and needed to make a decision so we did. Thanks, Philip