From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Phil Karn Subject: Re: Off-by-one error in net/8021q/vlan.c Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 07:58:09 -0800 Message-ID: <4D5BF411.4020204@ka9q.net> References: <4D5BADCF.5000804@ka9q.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kaber@trash.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: richard -rw- weinberger Return-path: Received: from mail-pv0-f174.google.com ([74.125.83.174]:61337 "EHLO mail-pv0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751795Ab1BPP6O (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:58:14 -0500 Received: by pva4 with SMTP id 4so215142pva.19 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 07:58:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2/16/11 4:51 AM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Phil Karn wrote: >> The range check on vlan_id in register_vlan_device is off by one, and it >> prevents the creation of a vlan interface for vlan ID 4095. (OSX allows >> this, I checked.) > > Then OSX should fix their code. 4095 is reserved. > If it's reserved, then it's up to the user to reserve it. I actually had reason to use this to fix a misconfigured host that was using vlan 4095. This got in my way.