From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 64.mail-out.ovh.net ([91.121.185.65]) by linuxtogo.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PqOMj-0007AZ-55 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:19:13 +0100 Received: (qmail 8831 invoked by uid 503); 18 Feb 2011 10:55:44 -0000 Received: from b6.ovh.net (HELO mail240.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.56) by 64.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 18 Feb 2011 10:55:44 -0000 Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queueout) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 18 Feb 2011 13:18:01 +0200 Received: from pac33-2-82-240-38-71.fbx.proxad.net (HELO ?192.168.1.15?) (ebenard%eukrea.com@82.240.38.71) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 18 Feb 2011 13:18:00 +0200 Message-ID: <4D5E5568.5020308@eukrea.com> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:18:00 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eric_B=E9nard?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <201102170226.53460.schnitzeltony@gmx.de> <201102171342.16551.schnitzeltony@gmx.de> <201102171808.51219.schnitzeltony@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <201102171808.51219.schnitzeltony@gmx.de> X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 6154168892085480777 X-Ovh-Remote: 82.240.38.71 (pac33-2-82-240-38-71.fbx.proxad.net) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.5/N Subject: Re: QA RPATH error for c++ packages? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:19:13 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, On 17/02/2011 18:08, Andreas Mueller wrote: > @Khem forget the last mail - sorry > > My guess is still that the QA RPATH error is caused by some generic problem with > c++ sources / libstdc++ - independent of clutter-box2d or other recipes > meantioned before. Hints on this are > > 1. ALL packages which have sysroot path for 'libstdc++.la' in '.libs/*.lai > have a QA RPATH error! > > 2. In '/sysroots/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/usr/lib/libstdc++.la' I find > > | # Directory that this library needs to be installed in: > | libdir=/home/Superandi/tmp/sysroots/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/usr/lib > > 3. So (don't kill me) I modified '/sysroots/armv7a-angstrom-linux- > gnueabi/usr/lib/libstdc++.la' to > > | # Directory that this library needs to be installed in: > | libdir=/usr/lib > > And rebuild some of the QA RPATH candidates mentioned before > > clutter-box2d > aspell > enchant > > WITHOUT QA ERRORS!! > > To me it seems as matter of gcc ( in my case 4.3.3 ) > > | TARGET_ARCH = "arm" > | TARGET_OS = "linux-gnueabi" > | MACHINE = "overo" > | DISTRO = "angstrom" > | DISTRO_VERSION = "2010.7-test-20110217" > > What do you think? > I confirm this also works for angstrom 2008.1 where I met a qa problem in gnutlsxx. Eric