From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 64.mail-out.ovh.net ([91.121.185.65]) by linuxtogo.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PqPzt-00039p-4H for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:03:45 +0100 Received: (qmail 17660 invoked by uid 503); 18 Feb 2011 12:40:14 -0000 Received: from b6.ovh.net (HELO mail240.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.56) by 64.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 18 Feb 2011 12:40:14 -0000 Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queueout) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 18 Feb 2011 15:02:31 +0200 Received: from pac33-2-82-240-38-71.fbx.proxad.net (HELO ?192.168.1.15?) (ebenard%eukrea.com@82.240.38.71) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 18 Feb 2011 15:02:29 +0200 Message-ID: <4D5E6DE5.5070206@eukrea.com> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:02:29 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eric_B=E9nard?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <201102170226.53460.schnitzeltony@gmx.de> <201102171808.51219.schnitzeltony@gmx.de> <4D5E5568.5020308@eukrea.com> <201102181351.06282.schnitzeltony@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <201102181351.06282.schnitzeltony@gmx.de> X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 7918735520705064265 X-Ovh-Remote: 82.240.38.71 (pac33-2-82-240-38-71.fbx.proxad.net) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.500001/N Subject: Re: QA RPATH error for c++ packages? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 13:03:45 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi, On 18/02/2011 13:51, Andreas Mueller wrote: > On Friday 18 February 2011 12:18:00 Eric Bénard wrote: > >> I confirm this also works for angstrom 2008.1 where I met a qa problem in >> gnutlsxx. > yes another victim... > > I think this issue is fixed by removing ${STAGING_DIR_TARGET} at the end of > cross.bbclass. > can't that come from the sed at line 43 of gcc-package-cross.inc ? Eric