From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 64.mail-out.ovh.net ([91.121.185.65]) by linuxtogo.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PqSTo-0006tz-Ra for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:42:48 +0100 Received: (qmail 20511 invoked by uid 503); 18 Feb 2011 15:19:19 -0000 Received: from b6.ovh.net (HELO mail240.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.56) by 64.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 18 Feb 2011 15:19:19 -0000 Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queueout) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 18 Feb 2011 17:41:36 +0200 Received: from pac33-2-82-240-38-71.fbx.proxad.net (HELO ?192.168.1.15?) (ebenard%eukrea.com@82.240.38.71) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 18 Feb 2011 17:41:36 +0200 Message-ID: <4D5E932F.1000907@eukrea.com> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:41:35 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?RXJpYyBCw6luYXJk?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1298026721-16036-1-git-send-email-eric@eukrea.com> In-Reply-To: X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 10605977123745803593 X-Ovh-Remote: 82.240.38.71 (pac33-2-82-240-38-71.fbx.proxad.net) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.5/N Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] oestats-client: only send report when task has failed X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:42:48 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Khem, On 18/02/2011 16:35, Khem Raj wrote: > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 2:58 AM, Eric Bénard wrote: >> actual behaviour is to send a report for *each* task runned by bitbake >> this is ok for one personnal oestat server but doesn't scale well when >> dozen of peoples are running test builders which all send reports to >> the OE's infrastructure. >> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Bénard >> --- >> v2: cleaner way to handle the problem as per pb& Jay2 suggestion >> >> classes/oestats-client.bbclass | 6 ++++-- >> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/classes/oestats-client.bbclass b/classes/oestats-client.bbclass >> index 4233d4a..f9ac88f 100644 >> --- a/classes/oestats-client.bbclass >> +++ b/classes/oestats-client.bbclass >> @@ -202,8 +202,10 @@ python oestats_eventhandler () { >> oestats_stop(server, e.data, e.getFailures()) >> elif getName(e) == 'TaskStarted': >> bb.data.setVar('OESTATS_STAMP', repr(time.time()), e.data) >> - elif getName(e) == 'TaskSucceeded': >> - oestats_task(server, e.data, e.task, 'Succeeded') >> + # Temporary disable sending sucess report as this generates to much trafic >> + # for the oestat server >> + # elif getName(e) == 'TaskSucceeded': >> + # oestats_task(server, e.data, e.task, 'Succeeded') >> elif getName(e) == 'TaskFailed': >> oestats_task(server, e.data, e.task, 'Failed') >> } > > > will this mean that only failed packages show up on tinderbox ? exactly. this is a temporary solution and I think this is better than no more having tinderbox running. Eric