From: Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC][PATCH] ARMV7: Patch to fix hard float build issues
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 14:19:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D5FC34B.5050309@ahsoftware.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yw1xtyg05l1f.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com>
Hello,
Am 19.02.2011 12:19, schrieb M?ns Rullg?rd:
>> In no case, however, should -msoft-float be *removed*: that would make
>> float support in U-Boot implicit and dependent on the toolchain in use,
>> and I think U-Boot float support should always be explicit and not
>> depend on the toolchain.
>
> There is no reason for supporting hardware floating-point in u-boot. If
> floating-point is used at all, and I can't think of a place where it is,
> it is not relevant to performance. The added complexity of supporting a
> hardware FPU is not worth it, in my opinion.
I still don't understand this discussion. Floats aren't used in u-boot,
so why should it make a difference if -msoft-float will be removed? I
know there was one bug which linked in something wrong from glibc, but
if that flag isn't needed than it shouldn't make a difference at all if
-msoft-float or -mhard-float is used.
So whats the reasoning to use -msoft-float as it is currently done? To
confuse people? ;)
Regards,
Alexander
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-19 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-18 15:16 [U-Boot] [RFC][PATCH] ARMV7: Patch to fix hard float build issues Raghuveer Murthy
2011-02-18 17:01 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-02-18 21:11 ` Alexander Holler
2011-02-19 11:19 ` Måns Rullgård
2011-02-19 13:19 ` Alexander Holler [this message]
2011-02-19 13:25 ` Måns Rullgård
2011-02-19 13:51 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-02-19 14:06 ` Alexander Holler
2011-02-19 14:27 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-02-19 14:34 ` Måns Rullgård
2011-02-19 15:18 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-02-19 18:36 ` Måns Rullgård
2011-02-19 19:37 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-02-19 14:39 ` Alexander Holler
[not found] ` <4D5FE29A.6050609@free.fr>
2011-02-19 15:40 ` Alexander Holler
2011-02-19 15:59 ` [U-Boot] reasons for armv5 as default Alexander Holler
2011-02-19 17:48 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-02-20 2:20 ` Alexander Holler
2011-02-19 19:46 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-02-19 19:39 ` [U-Boot] [RFC][PATCH] ARMV7: Patch to fix hard float build issues Wolfgang Denk
2011-02-19 19:33 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-02-19 19:32 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-02-19 19:26 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-02-18 22:41 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-02-19 19:55 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-02-21 10:36 ` Raghuveer Murthy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D5FC34B.5050309@ahsoftware.de \
--to=holler@ahsoftware.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.