From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4D605B70.6010508@domain.hid> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 01:08:16 +0100 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20101220154041.48C75CDE29A@gemini.denx.de> <20110215200753.C4B6C146940@domain.hid> <1297880887.1947.3.camel@domain.hid> <1298111755.3304.1.camel@domain.hid> <4D5FE8D6.6030204@domain.hid> <4D601B37.2010003@domain.hid> <1298156382.3304.13.camel@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <1298156382.3304.13.camel@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Xenomai on Freescale iMX35 List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Marten Lootsma Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org Marten Lootsma wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for clarifying. I am quite blue to git/kernel/versioning and in > my optimism I underestimated the complexity of versioning and patching. > I guess therefore I did not understand the answer of Wolfgang totally. > > Do I understand correct that: Xenomai support for iMX35 depends fully on > the developers of Freescale to put their patches into the mainline > kernel? The thing is, there are various degrees of support. The mainline kernel probably only supports part of what the iMX35 proposes. This is probably sufficient for porting Xenomai. The freescale kernel probably supports much more than that, but needs more work to get Xenomai running. Now, it all depends on what you need. -- Gilles.