From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39DA24C8086E for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 11:46:45 -0600 (CST) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p1KHkYvt019122 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sun, 20 Feb 2011 09:46:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from Macintosh-5.local (172.25.36.226) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.255.0; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 09:46:34 -0800 Message-ID: <4D615378.6040305@windriver.com> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 11:46:32 -0600 From: Mark Hatle Organization: Wind River Systems User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Tapp References: <466E08F0-1ADF-4618-A7DA-B6390C7AC2A9@keylevel.com> <4D612A83.7040302@windriver.com> <72C3267D-6313-42A0-A105-A288B7576F53@keylevel.com> <4D61353D.9040808@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP: [172.25.36.226] Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: What builds 'netbase'? X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 17:46:45 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2/20/11 9:50 AM, Chris Tapp wrote: > On 20 Feb 2011, at 15:37, Mark Hatle wrote: > >> To me it looks like it deleted exactly what you asked it to. All of >> the >> sstate-netbase-* files, and the downloaded netbase_4.41.tar.gz. > > It's not that easy to see when the lines get mangled. Below are the > ends of the 'ls' and 'cleanall' names for _populate_sysroot. > > sstate: -7422fec9d26be091358f8e930110bf37_populate-sysroot.tgz > (existing file after build) > NOTE: -4c81cdca2e1c8da43ee609321b93895f_populate-sysroot.tgz > (cleanall delete target) > > Doesn't this show that the wrong one was targeted for deletion? No, the md5sum is the signature of the recipe. If the signature changes, it should avoid the sstate-cache and rebuild. If it's still pulling in the version from the sstate, even though the signature changed.. this could indicate a problem. (Any time you change the recipe or referenced files in the recipe the signature should be changing... this won't trigger a rebuild though until you do a bitbake -c clean ... It will recompute the signature, see it doesn't match the sstate and build...) --Mark >> For the latest changes in master, we've got planned a bit more >> control then >> simply "clean" and "cleanall", but I don't believe it's implemented >> yet. > > That sounds interesting. For example, it would be nice to be able to > clean everything except the download (useful when working off-line). > > Chris > >