Re: [PATCH] kernel.bbclass: provide virtual/kernel-${PV}

[Andreas Oberritter <obi@opendreambox.org>]

Ping. Is there any reason not to apply this patch? Is there a better way
to solve the problem?

On 02/11/2011 02:25 PM, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> On 02/11/2011 02:18 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> On 11-02-11 14:02, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
>>> * Allow precompiled modules to depend on a specific kernel version.
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Oberritter <obi@opendreambox.org>
>>> ---
>>>  classes/kernel.bbclass |    2 +-
>>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>>> diff --git a/classes/kernel.bbclass b/classes/kernel.bbclass
>>> index 0d1b4ad..55e3ca0 100644
>>> --- a/classes/kernel.bbclass
>>> +++ b/classes/kernel.bbclass
>>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>>>  inherit linux-kernel-base module_strip
>>
>>> -PROVIDES += "virtual/kernel"
>>> +PROVIDES += "virtual/kernel virtual/kernel-${PV}"
>>>  DEPENDS += "virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}gcc virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}depmod-${@get_kernelmajorversion('${PV}')} virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}gcc${KERNEL_CCSUFFIX} update-modules bluez-dtl1-workaround"
>>
>>>  # we include gcc above, we dont need virtual/libc
>>
>> How is PV know before the kernel is built? The line below has a
>> workaround for that, so I guess it also needs one in PROVIDES, no?
> 
> KERNEL_VERSION is what's unknown until after the build. PV is the
> version set by the recipe. The line below uses PV to derive 2.4 or 2.6
> from that.
> 
> Regards,
> Andreas
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel