All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-2.6.18-xen] blktap: make max # of	 tap devices a module parameter
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 18:34:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D63F3B7.90108@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D63E918020000780003327C@vpn.id2.novell.com>

On 02/22/11 16:49, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 22.02.11 at 15:20, Laszlo Ersek<lersek@redhat.com>  wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> should anybody still use the blktap(1) driver in linux-2.6.18-xen, the
>> following patch intends to make the maximum number of tapdevs
>> configurable at module insertion time. The number is clamped to [256 ..
>> NR_EVENT_CHANNELS]. I removed the definition of MAX_DEV_NAME because it
>> didn't seem to be used at all.
>>
>> Thanks for considering,
>> Laszlo Ersek
>
> Without replacing the call to register_chrdev() with one to
> __register_chrdev() (available only with 2.6.32 and newer) I
> can't see how you would get beyond 256 devices with the
> changes you propose.

Oops, sorry; I naively assumed that minor device numbers were already 
covered by an earlier change.

I figure register_chrdev() could be reimplemented in blktap, based on 
lower-level char_dev.c (and kobject) primitives, but I'm not sure if the 
original goal is worth that ugliness. In any case, should I bother 
posting a version like that eventually, or would it have no chance of 
being accepted?

Thanks & sorry for the noise.
lacos

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-22 17:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-22 14:20 [PATCH linux-2.6.18-xen] blktap: make max # of tap devices a module parameter Laszlo Ersek
2011-02-22 15:49 ` Jan Beulich
2011-02-22 17:34   ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2011-02-22 17:44     ` Daniel Stodden
2011-02-22 18:08       ` Laszlo Ersek
2011-02-22 18:59         ` Daniel Stodden
2011-02-23 10:38       ` Jan Beulich
2011-02-24 16:40         ` Jan Beulich
2011-02-24 19:59           ` Daniel Stodden
2011-02-24 20:10           ` Daniel Stodden
2011-02-23  9:42     ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D63F3B7.90108@redhat.com \
    --to=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.