From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail.multimedia-labs.de ([82.149.226.172])
	by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <obi@opendreambox.org>) id 1Prwvn-0004bQ-Fw
	for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org;
	Tue, 22 Feb 2011 19:25:51 +0100
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.multimedia-labs.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A753D314DF57
	for <openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>;
	Tue, 22 Feb 2011 19:24:34 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.multimedia-labs.de
Received: from mail.multimedia-labs.de ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (mail.multimedia-labs.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024) with LMTP id SfS4swIwJzEL
	for <openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>;
	Tue, 22 Feb 2011 19:24:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [172.22.22.61] (ip-94-79-168-47.unitymediagroup.de
	[94.79.168.47])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.multimedia-labs.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 53A1D314DF4C
	for <openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>;
	Tue, 22 Feb 2011 19:24:29 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4D63FF5C.30400@opendreambox.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 19:24:28 +0100
From: Andreas Oberritter <obi@opendreambox.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110208 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
References: <AANLkTimy_TtONvPFjaGCUV0qxaM7qF0ENBx7A6wzRnPZ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4D63F7F9.7000804@eukrea.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D63F7F9.7000804@eukrea.com>
Subject: Re: Weird behaviour with PPP
X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions
	<openembedded-devel.lists.openembedded.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/openembedded-devel>,
	<mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel>,
	<mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 18:25:51 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi,

On 02/22/2011 06:52 PM, Eric Benard wrote:
> On 22/02/2011 18:22, Mickael Chazaux wrote:
>> I have a hard time figuring out why bitbake seems to mix versions of
>> ppp... Any ideas?
>>
> strange, which distro, git tag, bitbake version are you using ?
> 
> Both bitbake ppp-2.4.5 & bitbake -b
> openembedded/recipes/ppp/ppp_2.4.5.bb work fine here (angstrom 2008.1,
> armv5 target, bitbake 1.12.0).

I don't think this has anything to do with ppp. I faced the same issue
with a local recipe, of which an older version had been built before.
When packaging, the old version was used. A new workdir was created for
the old version during this step and the resulting packages were empty.
No recipe existed for this old version at that time, i.e. PR had already
been increased to 1.0, but 0.0 was used by bitbake.

In the end, I deleted bitbake's cache and all files matching the
package's name to get rid of the annoying problem. I think there were
pstage packages of the old version lying around.

Versions used were bitbake master and oe master of one or two weeks ago
(opendreambox distro / mipsel).

Regards,
Andreas