All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>
To: michael.hennerich@analog.com
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, drivers@analog.com,
	device-drivers-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IIO: ADC: AD7476: Update timestamp handling
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 19:51:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D66B6DE.1080002@cam.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1298574577-8373-1-git-send-email-michael.hennerich@analog.com>

On 02/24/11 19:09, michael.hennerich@analog.com wrote:
> From: Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@analog.com>
> 
> Add timestamp attributes.
> Revise timestamp handling accordingly.
> Preset timestamp generation.

As an aside:

An alternative would be to define an always on version of IIO_SCAN_EL_TIMESTAMP.
That would lead to smaller changes.  This way means we can turn it off though, which
on simple devices like this one means a big saving in 'ring_buffer' usage.

Patch is good, thanks. Technically this fixes a bug (by conforming to the abi)
as you pointed out the other day so could go to stable. Up to you...
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@analog.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7476.h      |    1 +
>  drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7476_ring.c |   37 +++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7476.h b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7476.h
> index b51b49e..f917e9c 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7476.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7476.h
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ struct ad7476_state {
>  	struct regulator		*reg;
>  	struct work_struct		poll_work;
>  	atomic_t			protect_ring;
> +	size_t				d_size;
>  	u16				int_vref_mv;
>  	struct spi_transfer		xfer;
>  	struct spi_message		msg;
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7476_ring.c b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7476_ring.c
> index 85de142..1d654c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7476_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7476_ring.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,8 @@
>  #include "ad7476.h"
>  
>  static IIO_SCAN_EL_C(in0, 0, 0, NULL);
> +static IIO_SCAN_EL_TIMESTAMP(1);
> +static IIO_CONST_ATTR_SCAN_EL_TYPE(timestamp, s, 64, 64);
>  
>  static ssize_t ad7476_show_type(struct device *dev,
>  				struct device_attribute *attr,
> @@ -44,6 +46,9 @@ static IIO_DEVICE_ATTR(in_type, S_IRUGO, ad7476_show_type, NULL, 0);
>  static struct attribute *ad7476_scan_el_attrs[] = {
>  	&iio_scan_el_in0.dev_attr.attr,
>  	&iio_const_attr_in0_index.dev_attr.attr,
> +	&iio_const_attr_timestamp_index.dev_attr.attr,
> +	&iio_scan_el_timestamp.dev_attr.attr,
> +	&iio_const_attr_timestamp_type.dev_attr.attr,
>  	&iio_dev_attr_in_type.dev_attr.attr,
>  	NULL,
>  };
> @@ -86,16 +91,21 @@ error_ret:
>  static int ad7476_ring_preenable(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
>  {
>  	struct ad7476_state *st = indio_dev->dev_data;
> -	size_t d_size;
> +	struct iio_ring_buffer *ring = indio_dev->ring;
>  
> -	if (indio_dev->ring->access.set_bytes_per_datum) {
> -		d_size = st->chip_info->storagebits / 8 + sizeof(s64);
> -		if (d_size % 8)
> -			d_size += 8 - (d_size % 8);
> -		indio_dev->ring->access.set_bytes_per_datum(indio_dev->ring,
> -							    d_size);
> +	st->d_size = ring->scan_count * st->chip_info->storagebits / 8;
> +
> +	if (ring->scan_timestamp) {
> +		st->d_size += sizeof(s64);
> +
> +		if (st->d_size % sizeof(s64))
> +			st->d_size += sizeof(s64) - (st->d_size % sizeof(s64));
>  	}
>  
> +	if (indio_dev->ring->access.set_bytes_per_datum)
> +		indio_dev->ring->access.set_bytes_per_datum(indio_dev->ring,
> +							    st->d_size);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -131,18 +141,12 @@ static void ad7476_poll_bh_to_ring(struct work_struct *work_s)
>  	s64 time_ns;
>  	__u8 *rxbuf;
>  	int b_sent;
> -	size_t d_size;
> -
> -	/* Ensure the timestamp is 8 byte aligned */
> -	d_size = st->chip_info->storagebits / 8 + sizeof(s64);
> -	if (d_size % sizeof(s64))
> -		d_size += sizeof(s64) - (d_size % sizeof(s64));
>  
>  	/* Ensure only one copy of this function running at a time */
>  	if (atomic_inc_return(&st->protect_ring) > 1)
>  		return;
>  
> -	rxbuf = kzalloc(d_size,	GFP_KERNEL);
> +	rxbuf = kzalloc(st->d_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (rxbuf == NULL)
>  		return;
>  
> @@ -152,7 +156,9 @@ static void ad7476_poll_bh_to_ring(struct work_struct *work_s)
>  
>  	time_ns = iio_get_time_ns();
>  
> -	memcpy(rxbuf + d_size - sizeof(s64), &time_ns, sizeof(time_ns));
> +	if (indio_dev->ring->scan_timestamp)
> +		memcpy(rxbuf + st->d_size - sizeof(s64),
> +			&time_ns, sizeof(time_ns));
>  
>  	indio_dev->ring->access.store_to(&sw_ring->buf, rxbuf, time_ns);
>  done:
> @@ -182,6 +188,7 @@ int ad7476_register_ring_funcs_and_init(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
>  	indio_dev->ring->postenable = &iio_triggered_ring_postenable;
>  	indio_dev->ring->predisable = &iio_triggered_ring_predisable;
>  	indio_dev->ring->scan_el_attrs = &ad7476_scan_el_group;
> +	indio_dev->ring->scan_timestamp = true;
>  
>  	INIT_WORK(&st->poll_work, &ad7476_poll_bh_to_ring);
>  


      parent reply	other threads:[~2011-02-24 19:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-24 19:09 [PATCH] IIO: ADC: AD7476: Update timestamp handling michael.hennerich
2011-02-24 19:09 ` [PATCH] IIO: ADC: AD7887: " michael.hennerich
2011-02-24 19:54   ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-02-24 19:09 ` [PATCH] IIO: ADC: AD7606: " michael.hennerich
2011-02-24 19:55   ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-02-24 19:09 ` [PATCH] IIO: ADC: AD799x: " michael.hennerich
2011-02-24 19:55   ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-02-24 20:31     ` Hennerich, Michael
2011-02-24 19:51 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D66B6DE.1080002@cam.ac.uk \
    --to=jic23@cam.ac.uk \
    --cc=device-drivers-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org \
    --cc=drivers@analog.com \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.hennerich@analog.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.