From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PthdO-00041I-Q8 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 15:30:06 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pthc1-0005Xf-3g for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 15:28:41 +0100 Received: from arcturus.eng.cam.ac.uk ([129.169.154.73]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 15:28:41 +0100 Received: from jic23 by arcturus.eng.cam.ac.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 15:28:41 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Jonathan Cameron Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 14:29:06 +0000 Message-ID: <4D6A5FB2.4070604@cam.ac.uk> References: <1298049536.11289.3126.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: arcturus.eng.cam.ac.uk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110122 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.7 In-Reply-To: <1298049536.11289.3126.camel@rex> Cc: openembedded-devel , bitbake-dev Subject: Re: Bitbake 1.12.0 released! X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 14:30:06 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/18/11 17:18, Richard Purdie wrote: > Bitbake 1.12.0 has been released. > > http://prdownload.berlios.de/bitbake/bitbake-1.12.0.tar.gz > > This release has many cleanups and improvements to the bitbake core. The > biggest and most user visible change is the parallel parsing work which > is the driving reason for the release. > > A git log of the differences between 1.10 and 1.12 follows. > It's a dumb question, but what are the intended restrictions on python version for running bitbake? 1.10 seems to work fine with python2.7 whereas I can only get 1.12 to work with python2.6. Issue is: Traceback (most recent call last): File "./bitbake", line 43, in from bb.server.process import ProcessServer, ServerCommunicator ImportError: No module named process I'm not having a great deal of luck tracking down why that happens but then I haven't put all that much effort into it as yet! Jonathan