From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: nf_ct_tcp: better handling for SYN retransmissions after SYN+ACK Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 16:22:30 +0100 Message-ID: <4D6A6C36.9050402@trash.net> References: <20110226032834.4335.74168.stgit@decadence> <20110226033324.4335.53000.stgit@decadence> <4D695E73.2090006@netfilter.org> <4D698FCB.6060205@netfilter.org> <4D699421.4070309@netfilter.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Changli Gao To: Pablo Neira Ayuso Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:34989 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751144Ab1B0PW3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Feb 2011 10:22:29 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4D699421.4070309@netfilter.org> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 27.02.2011 01:00, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > On 27/02/11 00:42, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: >> On 26/02/11 22:45, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote: >>> On Sat, 26 Feb 2011, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: >>>> I have test it here, it works fine. Let me know if you're OK with it. >>> >>> The patch looks OK but I think Changli Gao is also right and it'd be >>> simpler to set the [reply][synack][SR] state to sIG. What do you think? >> >> I read his email before leaving and after I made the new patch. >> >> Indeed, his idea is simpler, here's a new patch. I tested it here, it >> works fine. >> >> Patrick, please apply! > > Hm, I forgot to include the description. New patch attached. Thanks. I'll apply this tommorrow, assuming Jozsef is fine with this version.