From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay1.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.131]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Pu8AU-0004aX-Gl for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:50:02 +0100 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1Pu896-0004U6-Ks from Tom_Rini@mentor.com for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 10:48:36 -0800 Received: from SVR-ORW-FEM-05.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.97.43]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 28 Feb 2011 10:48:36 -0800 Received: from [172.30.80.189] (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-05 (147.34.97.43) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.270.1; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 10:48:35 -0800 Message-ID: <4D6BEDF2.20006@mentor.com> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 11:48:18 -0700 From: Tom Rini Organization: Mentor Graphics Corporation User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <4D6BBFDE.2090406@mentor.com> <20110228170111.GB4192@excalibur.local> In-Reply-To: <20110228170111.GB4192@excalibur.local> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Feb 2011 18:48:36.0484 (UTC) FILETIME=[1B55B440:01CBD778] Subject: Re: Release-2011.03 status X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:50:02 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/28/2011 10:01 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > Hello. > > On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 08:31, Tom Rini wrote: >> >> So, my current plan of attack is to do what I've said before and >> merge the libvpx work-around, tag, revert the libvpx work-around >> (per Khem's request). And I plan to do this tomorrow unless people >> shout about wanting to fix something they know is broken and need a >> little more time. > > For llvm and thus openjdk-6 we need the patch merged I posted today. I'm not > completely sure that it is the best solutions thats why I posted it instead of > just commit it. Hmm, can you show the failure log? Thanks! -- Tom Rini Mentor Graphics Corporation