From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC5BF4C80A89 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 19:36:33 -0600 (CST) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p221aXLa021041 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 17:36:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from Macintosh-5.local (172.25.36.227) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.255.0; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 17:36:32 -0800 Message-ID: <4D6D9F1F.8020705@windriver.com> Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 19:36:31 -0600 From: Mark Hatle Organization: Wind River Systems User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <201103011023.58911.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> <34ADCD70-E17B-459F-88E7-D959B0DB4737@dominion.thruhere.net> <201103011624.06798.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> <4D6D9E1C.6010104@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: <4D6D9E1C.6010104@windriver.com> X-Originating-IP: [172.25.36.227] Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add qt3 to poky X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 01:36:33 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit I think we should be sure to clearly label the Qt3 as only provided for LSB compatibility in the recipe, that way if someone tries to use it, they can understand why it was added/maintained. --Mark On 3/1/11 7:32 PM, Xiaofeng Yan wrote: > On 2011年03月02日 00:24, Paul Eggleton wrote: >> On Tuesday 01 March 2011 10:33:08 you wrote: >>> And since there was never a qtopia for qt3 I highly doubt anyone is using >>> qt3/e. >> Well, you never know what people are doing behind closed doors. There was also >> once a version of SystemRescueCD that was using the then-current version of >> QtParted with Qt/Embedded 3.x to avoid including X. >> >> For our purposes though it's only for LSB at this stage, so embedded appears >> to be superfluous. >> >> Cheers, >> Paul >> _______________________________________________ >> poky mailing list >> poky@yoctoproject.org >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/poky >> > Hi All, > > Qt3 could be superfluous because qt4 can include qt3 functions. But the > most important is that our lsb-image must meet LSB's requirement. > Otherwise our yocto can't be permitted to use the LSB Certified > trademark. So qt3 is just for passing LSB test on lsb-image. > > Thanks > Yan > _______________________________________________ > poky mailing list > poky@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/poky