Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add qt3 to poky

[Saul Wold <saul.wold@intel.com>]

On 03/01/2011 07:12 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 3/1/11 9:03 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
>> On 03/01/2011 05:36 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
>>> I think we should be sure to clearly label the Qt3 as only provided for LSB
>>> compatibility in the recipe, that way if someone tries to use it, they can
>>> understand why it was added/maintained.
>>>
>> Mark,
>>
>> I thought we talked about this before, I did not think we where going
>> for 100% compliant in core yocto, and if needed, this can be part of the
>> WR layer in order to complete compliance.  I don't think we want to
>> carry around a recipe that is purely for compatibility at that level.
>
> What I remember is we were not sure it would go into 1.0.  And we were not yet
> sure what we wanted to do with a QT compatibility library, if it would ever go
> into "meta", another layer, or...
>
> I think LSB compliance makes sense in the meta layer because of the new
> "poky-lsb" distro.  It shouldn't hurt to carry this forward and maintain it for
> compatibility sake as part of the poky-lsb work.  (But I won't complain if it
> doesn't make it into 1.0, and we delay a final decision on if it goes in at all
> until later -- I just want to make sure the code isn't lost though...)
>
I would like to hold off on this change at this point.

We can visit later.

Thanks
	Sau!

> --Mark
>
>> Sau!
>>
>>> --Mark
>>>
>>> On 3/1/11 7:32 PM, Xiaofeng Yan wrote:
>>>> On 2011年03月02日 00:24, Paul Eggleton wrote:
>>>>> On Tuesday 01 March 2011 10:33:08 you wrote:
>>>>>> And since there was never a qtopia for qt3 I highly doubt anyone is using
>>>>>> qt3/e.
>>>>> Well, you never know what people are doing behind closed doors. There was also
>>>>> once a version of SystemRescueCD that was using the then-current version of
>>>>> QtParted with Qt/Embedded 3.x to avoid including X.
>>>>>
>>>>> For our purposes though it's only for LSB at this stage, so embedded appears
>>>>> to be superfluous.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Paul
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> poky mailing list
>>>>> poky@yoctoproject.org
>>>>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/poky
>>>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> Qt3 could be superfluous because qt4 can include qt3 functions. But the
>>>> most important is that our lsb-image must meet LSB's requirement.
>>>> Otherwise our yocto can't be permitted to use the LSB Certified
>>>> trademark. So qt3 is just for passing LSB test on lsb-image.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Yan
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> poky mailing list
>>>> poky@yoctoproject.org
>>>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/poky
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> poky mailing list
>>> poky@yoctoproject.org
>>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/poky
>>
>