From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.windriver.com ([147.11.1.11]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Puqtd-0005wj-HG for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 19:35:43 +0100 Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p22IXngQ001075 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 10:33:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from Macintosh-5.local (172.25.36.227) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.255.0; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 10:33:48 -0800 Message-ID: <4D6E8D8B.7030906@windriver.com> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 12:33:47 -0600 From: Mark Hatle Organization: Wind River Systems User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110221 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <4D6E7EB1.5080602@windriver.com> <1299088802.26736.10715.camel@rex> In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP: [172.25.36.227] Subject: Re: oe-core cleanup... X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 18:35:43 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 3/2/11 12:27 PM, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Op 2 mrt 2011, om 19:00 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: > >> Thanks for starting this thread Mark, I've also just been looking at >> this question so its timely. >> >> On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 11:30 -0600, Mark Hatle wrote: >>> I finally got a chance to look at the oe-core and where it currently is.. Some >>> suggestions below: >>> >>> LICENSE file, this may need to be cleaned up to only cover the components >>> actually in the oe-core. >>> >>> README likely needs some revision >>> >>> README.hardware needs a lot of revision. Anything outside of support for QEMU >>> should be removed. >>> >>> The meta-demoapps and meta-rt components, will those be staying or going? >>> >>> The meta/recipes.txt needs to be verified as still what we want -- I assume it >>> is at this point.. >>> >>> meta/recipes-... sato, qt, gnome, I thought were going elsewhere? >>> >>> Do the items in the "scripts" need to be renamed or is Poky being kept in the >>> naming? Same with the poky-init-build-env? >>> >>> Then I also assume the items in the documentation directory need to be cleaned >>> up as well... >>> >>> Let me know what you'd like me to try and tackle -- or if we need to bring these >>> items up at the TSC for recommendation. >> >> I'm proposing this change so far: >> >> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/commit/?h=rpurdie/roorg&id=891ad22536b49d4fee066a5865ad730f791d36e9 >> >> with those relocated files being removed from oe-core. Any objections to >> that to start with? > > Why not put the recipes in meta-oe? I have need for e.g eds-dbus and would like to have that in meta-oe. If it's acceptable within meta-oe (I don't see why this wouldn't be) it certainly can be added there as well.. however, I was assuming the default was meta-yocto and it not going into meta-oe until a separate merge step, process, etc.. meta-oe would be made up of the existing OE components (not in core) initially... --Mark > regards, > > Koen > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core