From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Lezcano Subject: Re: [RFC] Payloads and transient filesystem support for user-cr Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 19:18:25 +0100 Message-ID: <4D6FDB71.7050603@free.fr> References: <1299101725-17603-1-git-send-email-danms@us.ibm.com> <4D6EBF24.4000601@free.fr> <877hch6oi2.fsf@caffeine.danplanet.com> <4D6F52DF.1040808@free.fr> <87vd005ks5.fsf@caffeine.danplanet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87vd005ks5.fsf-FLMGYpZoEPULwtHQx/6qkW3U47Q5hpJU@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Dan Smith Cc: containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org On 03/03/2011 03:41 PM, Dan Smith wrote: > DL> Well a simple test program doing sem_* operations should have > DL> spotted the problem. > > I know, can you believe that our stuff didn't test this specific case? > I'll have to give the authors of our tests a hard time about this one > for sure :) Don't blame them. They may have missed the test case but you missed the CR of the posix semaphore, far away from a couple of parsecs ;)