From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Subject: Re: [GIT PULL FOR 2.6.39] Media controller and OMAP3 ISP driver Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 15:22:28 -0300 Message-ID: <4D727F64.7040805@redhat.com> References: <201102171606.58540.laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> <201103031125.06419.laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> <4D713CBD.7030405@redhat.com> <201103051402.34416.laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201103051402.34416.laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Laurent Pinchart Cc: "linux-media@vger.kernel.org" , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Sakari Ailus , Pawel Osciak List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Em 05-03-2011 10:02, Laurent Pinchart escreveu: > Hi Mauro, > > Thanks for the review. Let me address all your concerns in a single mail. > > - ioctl numbers > > I'll send you a patch that reserves a range in Documentation/ioctl/ioctl- > number.txt and update include/linux/media.h accordingly. Ok, thanks. > > - private ioctls > > As already explained by David, the private ioctls are used to control advanced > device features that can't be handled by V4L2 controls at the moment (such as > setting a gamma correction table). Using those ioctls is not mandatory, and > the device will work correctly without them (albeit with a non optimal image > quality). > > David said he will submit a patch to document the ioctls. Ok. > - media bus formats > > As Hans explained, there's no 1:1 relationship between media bus formats and > pixel formats. Yet, there are some relationship between them. See my comments on my previous email. > - FOURCC and media bus codes documentation > > I forgot to document some of them. I'll send a new patch that adds the missing > documentation. Ok. > > > Is there any other issue I need to address ? Nothing else, in the patches I've analysed so far. I'll take a look at the remaining omap3isp after receiving the documentation for the private ioctl's. > My understanding is that there's > no need to rebase the existing patches, is that correct ? Yes, it is correct. Just send the new patches to be applied at the end of the series. I'll eventually reorder them if needed to avoid breaking git bisect. Thanks! Mauro.