From: "Brian J. Murrell" <brian@interlinx.bc.ca>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: efficiency of btrfs cow
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2011 11:17:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D73B389.1010803@interlinx.bc.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1299427596.15017.8.camel@ayu>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1514 bytes --]
On 11-03-06 11:06 AM, Calvin Walton wrote:
>
> There actually is such a periodic jump in overhead,
Ahh. So my instincts were correct.
> caused by the way
> which btrfs dynamically allocates space for metadata as needed by the
> creation of new files, which it does whenever the free metadata space
> ratio reaches a threshold (it's probably more complicated than that, but
> close enough for now).
Sounds fair enough.
> To see exactly what's going on, you should use the "btrfs filesystem df"
> command to see how space is being allocated for data and metadata
> separately:
>
> ayu ~ # btrfs fi df /
> Data: total=266.01GB, used=249.35GB
> System, DUP: total=8.00MB, used=36.00KB
> Metadata, DUP: total=3.62GB, used=1.93GB
> ayu ~ # df -h /
> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/sda4 402G 254G 145G 64% /
>
> If you use the btrfs tool's df command to account for space in your
> testing, you should get much more accurate results.
Indeed! Unfortunately that tool seems to be completely silent on my system:
# btrfs filesystem df /mnt/btrfs-test/
# btrfs filesystem df /mnt/btrfs-test
Where /mnt/btrfs-test is where I have the device that I created the
btrfs filesystem on mounted. i.e.:
# grep btrfs /proc/mounts
/dev/mapper/btrfs--test-btrfs--test /mnt/btrfs-test btrfs rw,relatime 0 0
My btrfs-tools appears to be from 20101101. The changelog says:
* Merging upstream version 0.19+20101101.
Cheers,
b.
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 262 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-06 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-06 15:46 efficiency of btrfs cow Brian J. Murrell
2011-03-06 16:02 ` Fajar A. Nugraha
2011-03-06 16:11 ` Brian J. Murrell
2011-03-06 16:17 ` Calvin Walton
2011-03-06 16:18 ` Brian J. Murrell
2011-03-06 17:22 ` Freddie Cash
2011-03-06 16:06 ` Calvin Walton
2011-03-06 16:17 ` Brian J. Murrell [this message]
2011-03-23 12:39 ` Brian J. Murrell
2011-03-23 15:53 ` Chester
2011-03-23 16:19 ` Brian J. Murrell
2011-03-23 17:36 ` Kolja Dummann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D73B389.1010803@interlinx.bc.ca \
--to=brian@interlinx.bc.ca \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.