From: Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
To: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Cc: poky@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] module: build and clean hostprogs for each module
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2011 09:21:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D73B4A1.5010409@mlbassoc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D715A2B.3080505@linux.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7850 bytes --]
On 03/04/11 14:31, Darren Hart wrote:
> On 03/04/2011 12:33 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
>> On 03/04/2011 03:44 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
>>> On 03/03/2011 09:39 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
>>>> On 03/03/2011 08:59 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
>>>>> On 03/03/2011 09:50 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
>>>>>> On 03/02/2011 11:00 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
>>>>>>> From: Darren Hart<dvhart@linux.intel.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This fixes [BUGID #241]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The kernel hostprogs are built for the host architecture. They should
>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>> be deployed with to the target, and they should not be included in an
>>>>>>> sstate
>>>>>>> package which might get reused on a host of a different architecture.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As we don't build many out-of-tree modules, this patch takes the
>>>>>>> approach
>>>>>>> of building the hostprogs as part of the module compile process
>>>>>>> with a
>>>>>>> do_compile_prepend() routine in module.bbclass. To ensure the
>>>>>>> hostprogs
>>>>>>> don't contaminate the build, they are removed in do_install_append().
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Darren Hart<dvhart@linux.intel.com>
>>>>>>> CC: Gary Thomas<gary@mlbassoc.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sadly, this doesn't seem to work for me. I don't see any indication in
>>>>>> run.do_compile that the extra steps were added at all.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Will it matter if my recipe overrides the do_compile() method?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, when you tested this, what was your target MACHINE (in
>>>>> particular,
>>>>> was the target a different architecture than the build host?) I ask
>>>>> because
>>>>> I tried to just manually insert the compile_prepend() functions into my
>>>>> recipe and it ended up trying to build host tools (that's what the fuss
>>>>> is all about) using the target toolchain.
>>>>
>>>> I made some modifications to avoid a Race that RP pointed out (just
>>>> removed the cleans from the module.bbclass since they weren't
>>>> necessary anyway). With this, I set my MACHINE to
>>>> beagleboard and built minimal. You can see from the following that
>>>> hostprogs were build for the host and the module for the target:
>>>>
>>>> dvhart@rage:build-beagleboard$ file
>>>> ./tmp/work/beagleboard-poky-linux-gnueabi/linux-yocto-2.6.37+git1+e2737075b79e4fc682e41051cf1c0bc47a47d502_1+2b412826bbeb4a16abe2ea74f2456ab880c6e3c1-r16/linux-beagleboard-standard-build/scripts/basic/fixdep
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ./tmp/work/beagleboard-poky-linux-gnueabi/linux-yocto-2.6.37+git1+e2737075b79e4fc682e41051cf1c0bc47a47d502_1+2b412826bbeb4a16abe2ea74f2456ab880c6e3c1-r16/linux-beagleboard-standard-build/scripts/basic/fixdep:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically
>>>> linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.15, not stripped
>>>
>>> Why are you looking in ${KERNEL_SRC}? It may not exist (think rm_work)
>>> when your module gets built.
>>>
>>> The example recipe I have uses ${STAGING_KERNEL_DIR} something like this:
>>> make -C ${STAGING_KERNEL_DIR} M=src
>>>
>>
>> module.bbclass passes KERNEL_SRC=${STAGING_KERNEL_DIR} to the module's
>> Makefile.
>>
>> I don't use STAGING_KERNEL_DIR in the hello-mod Makefile as I wanted the
>> Makefile to exemplary of external modules, and not poky specific.
>>
>>
>>> Also, if you look at the run.do_compile script for your module recipe, is
>>> there any indication that the compile_prepend() stuff was even added?
>>
>> I do see the compile_prepend() code prepended to the do_compile code:
>>
>> unset CFLAGS CPPFLAGS CXXFLAGS LDFLAGS
>> oe_runmake CC="arm-poky-linux-gnueabi-gcc "
>> LD="arm-poky-linux-gnueabi-ld
>> --sysroot=/home/dvhart/source/poky.git/build-beagleboard/tmp/sysroots/beagleboard
>> " AR="arm-poky-linux-gnueabi-ar " \
>> -C
>> /home/dvhart/source/poky.git/build-beagleboard/tmp/sysroots/beagleboard/kernel
>> scripts
>>
>> Hrm.... but looking at that, that's the target compiler... not the host
>> compiler... so why on earth did this work.... grumble. Some more
>> investigation remains it seems...
>
>
> Actually, this isn't a problem. For the compilation of hostprogs, the kernel Make system uses HOSTCC, not CC. From log.do_compile:
>
> make -C
> /home/dvhart/source/poky.git/build-beagleboard/tmp/work/beagleboard-poky-linux-gnueabi/linux-yocto-2.6.37+git1+e2737075b79e4fc682e41051cf1c0bc47a47d502_1+2b412826bbeb4a16abe2ea74f2456ab880c6e3c1-r16/linux
> O=/home/dvhart/source/poky.git/build-beagleboard/tmp/sysroots/beagleboard/kernel/. scripts
This sure looks like it's using the kernel source tree, not the staging tree. If you run with rm_work
and/or sstate caching, that directory may not exist! My example (which was lifted fro OE) uses the
kernel _staging_ directory, which should exist.
Recipe attached - I'm not sure how much use it is as it as a boat-load of dependencies
which are not germane to this issue.
> make[1]: Entering directory
> `/home/dvhart/source/poky.git/build-beagleboard/tmp/work/beagleboard-poky-linux-gnueabi/linux-yocto-2.6.37+git1+e2737075b79e4fc682e41051cf1c0bc47a47d502_1+2b412826bbeb4a16abe2ea74f2456ab880c6e3c1-r16/linux'
>
> HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep
> HOSTCC scripts/basic/docproc
> GEN /home/dvhart/source/poky.git/build-beagleboard/tmp/sysroots/beagleboard/kernel/Makefile
> HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/conf.o
> HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/kxgettext.o
> HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.o
> HOSTLD scripts/kconfig/conf
>
> While the module itself builds with:
>
> make -C
> /home/dvhart/source/poky.git/build-beagleboard/tmp/work/beagleboard-poky-linux-gnueabi/linux-yocto-2.6.37+git1+e2737075b79e4fc682e41051cf1c0bc47a47d502_1+2b412826bbeb4a16abe2ea74f2456ab880c6e3c1-r16/linux
> O=/home/dvhart/source/poky.git/build-beagleboard/tmp/sysroots/beagleboard/kernel/.
> LD /home/dvhart/source/poky.git/build-beagleboard/tmp/work/beagleboard-poky-linux-gnueabi/hello-mod-0.1-r0/built-in.o
> CC [M] /home/dvhart/source/poky.git/build-beagleboard/tmp/work/beagleboard-poky-linux-gnueabi/hello-mod-0.1-r0/hello.o
> Building modules, stage 2.
> MODPOST 1 modules
> CC /home/dvhart/source/poky.git/build-beagleboard/tmp/work/beagleboard-poky-linux-gnueabi/hello-mod-0.1-r0/hello.mod.o
> LD [M] /home/dvhart/source/poky.git/build-beagleboard/tmp/work/beagleboard-poky-linux-gnueabi/hello-mod-0.1-r0/hello.ko
>
>
> Things are working as intended for the hello-mod recipe.
>
> --
> Darren
>
>>
>>
>> > I don't see it in mine (yes, it inherits module)
>>
>> Even though there is something up with the script build above, you
>> should be seeing it in run.do_compile. Is this recipe something you can
>> share? Also, have you tried from a clean build? I ran into various
>> (strange) problems because I wasn't cleaning the right
>> tasks/recipes/etc. I think your problem is different, but might have a
>> similar cause.
>>
>> --
>> Darren
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> dvhart@rage:build-beagleboard$ file
>>>> ./tmp/work/beagleboard-poky-linux-gnueabi/hello-world-mod-1.0-r0/package/lib/modules/2.6.37.2-yocto-standard+/extra/hello_world.ko
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ./tmp/work/beagleboard-poky-linux-gnueabi/hello-world-mod-1.0-r0/package/lib/modules/2.6.37.2-yocto-standard+/extra/hello_world.ko:
>>>>
>>>> ELF 32-bit LSB relocatable, ARM, version 1
>>>> (SYSV), not stripped
>>>>
>>>> I'm going to do a beagleboard boot test, but if that works I'll be
>>>> resending these changes to close BUG 241 as they work on both qemux86
>>>> and beagleboard using hello-world-mod which
>>>> uses a very typical out-of-tree kernel module Make setup.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas | Consulting for the
MLB Associates | Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------
[-- Attachment #2: ti-linuxutils.inc --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3407 bytes --]
DESCRIPTION = "MFP Linux utils for TI ARM/DSP processors"
SECTION = "devel"
LICENSE = "GPLv2,BSD"
BASE_SRC_URI = "http://software-dl.ti.com/dsps/dsps_public_sw/sdo_sb/targetcontent/linuxutils/${PV}/exports"
SRC_URI = "${BASE_SRC_URI}/linuxutils_${PV}.tar.gz "
S = "${WORKDIR}/linuxutils_${PV}"
require ti-paths.inc
require ti-staging.inc
#This is a kernel module, don't set PR directly
MACHINE_KERNEL_PR_append = "d"
inherit module
do_compile() {
unset CFLAGS CPPFLAGS CXXFLAGS LDFLAGS
case ${SOC_FAMILY} in
dm365)
modules="cmem edma irq";;
omap3)
modules="cmem sdma";;
dm355)
modules="cmem edma irq";;
*)
modules="cmem"
esac
# Insure host tools are available
# HORRIBLE HACK
# Sadly, I can't see how to automate these builds since the normal
# way to do it using the Makefile ends up building target executables
# not useful host tools.
# make CROSS_COMPILE= -C ${STAGING_KERNEL_DIR}/scripts/basic fixdep
# make CROSS_COMPILE= -C ${STAGING_KERNEL_DIR} SUBDIRS=scripts
cd ${STAGING_KERNEL_DIR}/scripts/basic
cc -o fixdep fixdep.c
cd ${STAGING_KERNEL_DIR}/scripts/mod
cc -o modpost modpost.c file2alias.c sumversion.c
cd ${STAGING_KERNEL_DIR}/scripts/genksyms
cc -o genksyms genksyms.c parse.c lex.c
for module in $modules ; do
cd ${S}/packages/ti/sdo/linuxutils/$module
make \
LINUXKERNEL_INSTALL_DIR="${STAGING_KERNEL_DIR}" \
MVTOOL_PREFIX="${TARGET_PREFIX}" \
UCTOOL_PREFIX="${TARGET_PREFIX}" \
clean debug release
done
}
do_install () {
install -d ${D}/lib/modules/${KERNEL_VERSION}/kernel/drivers/dsp
# Install CMEM
for module in $(find ${S}/packages/ti/sdo/linuxutils/ -name "*.ko") ; do
install -m 0755 $module ${D}/lib/modules/${KERNEL_VERSION}/kernel/drivers/dsp
done
cd ${S}/packages/ti/sdo/linuxutils/cmem/apps
make \
LINUXKERNEL_INSTALL_DIR="${STAGING_KERNEL_DIR}" \
MVTOOL_PREFIX="${TARGET_PREFIX}" \
UCTOOL_PREFIX="${TARGET_PREFIX}" \
EXEC_DIR="${D}${installdir}/ti-linuxutils-app/cmem-app" \
install
# Install EDMA
if [ ${SOC_FAMILY} == "dm365" ] ; then
cd ${S}/packages/ti/sdo/linuxutils/edma/apps
make \
LINUXKERNEL_INSTALL_DIR="${STAGING_KERNEL_DIR}" \
MVTOOL_PREFIX="${TARGET_PREFIX}" \
UCTOOL_PREFIX="${TARGET_PREFIX}" \
EXEC_DIR="${D}${installdir}/ti-linuxutils-app/edma-app" \
install
fi
# stage tree - other packages may need this
install -d ${D}${LINUXUTILS_INSTALL_DIR_RECIPE}
cp -pPrf ${S}/* ${D}${LINUXUTILS_INSTALL_DIR_RECIPE}
}
PACKAGES =+ " ti-cmem-module \
ti-sdma-module \
ti-edma-module \
ti-irq-module \
ti-linuxutils-app"
FILES_ti-cmem-module = "/lib/modules/${KERNEL_VERSION}/kernel/drivers/dsp/cmem*.ko"
FILES_ti-sdma-module = "/lib/modules/${KERNEL_VERSION}/kernel/drivers/dsp/sdma*.ko"
FILES_ti-edma-module = "/lib/modules/${KERNEL_VERSION}/kernel/drivers/dsp/edma*.ko"
FILES_ti-irq-module = "/lib/modules/${KERNEL_VERSION}/kernel/drivers/dsp/irq*.ko"
FILES_ti-linuxutils-app = "${installdir}/ti-linuxutils-app/*/*"
INSANE_SKIP_ti-linuxutils-app = "True"
PACKAGE_STRIP = "no"
[-- Attachment #3: ti-linuxutils_2.26.01.02.bb --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 344 bytes --]
require ti-linuxutils.inc
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = " \
file://gpl_2.0.txt;md5=1298794fc2eed3df92a89f3c9d317440 \
"
SRC_URI += "file://linuxutils-BKL-fix-2.patch"
PE = "1"
PV = "2_26_01_02"
SRC_URI[md5sum] = "70b4918bc35c1bcfef34d6ba3fbce0c8"
SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "51266dd928f8d629cd417c869789a6c0d596612120f165619119cbaadfd66ee2"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-06 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-02 18:00 [PATCH 1/2] module: build and clean hostprogs for each module Darren Hart
2011-03-03 16:50 ` Gary Thomas
2011-03-03 16:59 ` Gary Thomas
2011-03-04 4:39 ` Darren Hart
2011-03-04 11:44 ` Gary Thomas
2011-03-04 20:33 ` Darren Hart
2011-03-04 21:31 ` Darren Hart
2011-03-06 16:21 ` Gary Thomas [this message]
2011-03-07 22:16 ` Darren Hart
2011-03-04 4:36 ` Darren Hart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D73B4A1.5010409@mlbassoc.com \
--to=gary@mlbassoc.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=poky@yoctoproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.