From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergei Shtylyov Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 03/19] OMAP3+: voltage: remove initial voltage Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 19:23:15 +0300 Message-ID: <4D750673.702@ru.mvista.com> References: <1299338962-5602-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> <1299338962-5602-4-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> <4D738E04.5090207@ru.mvista.com> <4D744870.20909@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:63196 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750877Ab1CGQYq (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Mar 2011 11:24:46 -0500 Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so4229990fxm.19 for ; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 08:24:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D744870.20909@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Nishanth Menon Cc: Sergei Shtylyov , linux-omap , Kevin Hilman , Tony , Paul , linux-arm Hello. On 07-03-2011 5:52, Nishanth Menon wrote: >>> Blindly setting a 1.2V setting >> Hm, seems tautological... > As a non native English speaker, I would like to understand how we could > improve this. I suppose you mean "Blindly setting 1.2V" is better here. Am i > correct? Yes. WBR, Sergei From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sshtylyov@mvista.com (Sergei Shtylyov) Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 19:23:15 +0300 Subject: [PATCH V3 03/19] OMAP3+: voltage: remove initial voltage In-Reply-To: <4D744870.20909@ti.com> References: <1299338962-5602-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> <1299338962-5602-4-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> <4D738E04.5090207@ru.mvista.com> <4D744870.20909@ti.com> Message-ID: <4D750673.702@ru.mvista.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello. On 07-03-2011 5:52, Nishanth Menon wrote: >>> Blindly setting a 1.2V setting >> Hm, seems tautological... > As a non native English speaker, I would like to understand how we could > improve this. I suppose you mean "Blindly setting 1.2V" is better here. Am i > correct? Yes. WBR, Sergei