From: Shan Wei <shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@gmail.com>
Cc: buytenh@wantstofly.org,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wireless: used kzalloc instead of kmalloc & memset
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 11:02:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D759C2B.1050400@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=T0eeNXrfBLdiPGch1X5EnHY+WrqYekXnZ+5=-@mail.gmail.com>
Julian Calaby wrote, at 03/07/2011 09:30 PM:
>> - rxq->buf = kmalloc(MWL8K_RX_DESCS * sizeof(*rxq->buf), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + rxq->buf = kzalloc(MWL8K_RX_DESCS * sizeof(*rxq->buf), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> Random nit, you're changing this from kmalloc to kzalloc when it would
> be trivial to change it to kcalloc instead if you don't restrict the T
> variable in your semantic patch to a type.
Thanks for your review.
here patch-v2.
==========================================
[PATCH v2] wireless: use kcalloc instead of kmalloc & memset
Use kcalloc or kzalloc rather than the combination of kmalloc and memset.
Thanks coccicheck for detecting this.
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
Signed-off-by: Shan Wei <shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c | 6 ++----
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c
index df5959f..3695227 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c
@@ -1056,13 +1056,12 @@ static int mwl8k_rxq_init(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, int index)
}
memset(rxq->rxd, 0, size);
- rxq->buf = kmalloc(MWL8K_RX_DESCS * sizeof(*rxq->buf), GFP_KERNEL);
+ rxq->buf = kcalloc(MWL8K_RX_DESCS, sizeof(*rxq->buf), GFP_KERNEL);
if (rxq->buf == NULL) {
wiphy_err(hw->wiphy, "failed to alloc RX skbuff list\n");
pci_free_consistent(priv->pdev, size, rxq->rxd, rxq->rxd_dma);
return -ENOMEM;
}
- memset(rxq->buf, 0, MWL8K_RX_DESCS * sizeof(*rxq->buf));
for (i = 0; i < MWL8K_RX_DESCS; i++) {
int desc_size;
@@ -1347,13 +1346,12 @@ static int mwl8k_txq_init(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, int index)
}
memset(txq->txd, 0, size);
- txq->skb = kmalloc(MWL8K_TX_DESCS * sizeof(*txq->skb), GFP_KERNEL);
+ txq->skb = kcalloc(MWL8K_TX_DESCS, sizeof(*txq->skb), GFP_KERNEL);
if (txq->skb == NULL) {
wiphy_err(hw->wiphy, "failed to alloc TX skbuff list\n");
pci_free_consistent(priv->pdev, size, txq->txd, txq->txd_dma);
return -ENOMEM;
}
- memset(txq->skb, 0, MWL8K_TX_DESCS * sizeof(*txq->skb));
for (i = 0; i < MWL8K_TX_DESCS; i++) {
struct mwl8k_tx_desc *tx_desc;
--
1.6.3.3
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-08 3:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-07 11:06 [PATCH] wireless: used kzalloc instead of kmalloc & memset Shan Wei
2011-03-07 13:30 ` Julian Calaby
2011-03-08 3:02 ` Shan Wei [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D759C2B.1050400@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=buytenh@wantstofly.org \
--cc=julian.calaby@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.