From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nikolai Kondrashov Subject: Re: [PATCH] Platform: add Samsung Laptop platform driver Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:05:09 +0200 Message-ID: <4D793D05.3070908@gmail.com> References: <20110209224006.GA11202@kroah.com> <20110225210334.GB16860@kroah.com> <4D6823DD.6040809@gmail.com> <20110225225055.GA5931@kroah.com> <4D787714.6060405@gmail.com> <20110310170143.GA24559@kroah.com> <20110310171940.GA24972@kroah.com> <4D790A20.3050105@gmail.com> <20110310180959.GA26927@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:49013 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752934Ab1CJVGo (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:06:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20110310180959.GA26927@kroah.com> Sender: platform-driver-x86-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Greg KH Cc: Matthew Garrett , Randy Dunlap , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org On 03/10/2011 08:09 PM, Greg KH wrote: > Great, here's a new version of the samsung-laptop.c file, can you > replace it whereever you were building the previous one, rebuild it and > test it for this machine to see if it works? This is really strange. It's all the same. I tried the new samsung-laptop.c on n230 and the previous version on n210 - the results are the same as before. Could it be that samsung-laptop has some dependencies unspecified? I'm using the stock 2.6.32 kernel configuration on 2.6.37 after running make menuconfig. I can' send it to you, if you wish. Thank you :) Sincerely, Nick