From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Schmidt Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 22:10:45 +0000 Subject: Re: [mlmmj] Any use case for subscribing to multiple versions Message-Id: <4D794C65.1060100@yahoo.com.au> List-Id: References: <4D78B56D.1020804@yahoo.com.au> In-Reply-To: <4D78B56D.1020804@yahoo.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: mlmmj@mlmmj.org On 11/03/11 5:04 AM, Marco S Hyman wrote: > On Mar 10, 2011, at 3:26 AM, Ben Schmidt wrote: > >> Is there any use case for being subscribed to multiple versions of >> the same list? I can't think of a useful one. > > I subscribe to both normal and digest versions of the lists I manage. > It's the easiest way to see if I'm having digest issues. The cost is > a daily hit of the delete key. I guess this is something only the list owner would ever want. How about we make this available only from the commandline (via a switch to mlmmj-sub), but make the standard behaviour that subs unsub you from other versions of the list? Ben.