From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4D79E43D.2040807@domain.hid> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 09:58:37 +0100 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4D79DD32.4050307@domain.hid> <4D79E28B.3090004@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <4D79E28B.3090004@domain.hid> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigA4F101819F445385773CEE1F" Sender: jan.kiszka@domain.hid Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] rt_task_delete trouble List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gilles Chanteperdrix Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigA4F101819F445385773CEE1F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2011-03-11 09:51, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Johann Obermayr wrote: >> void task_waiter_do(void *data) >> { >> rt_printf("task_waiter_do started\n"); >> while(task_waiter_flag =3D=3D 0) >> ; // rt_task_sleep( DELAYMS(1) ); >> rt_printf("task_waiter_do finished\n"); >> } >=20 > What happens if you uncomment the rt_task_sleep here ? >=20 Given how often users make this mistake, should we enable the watchdog by default? Jan --------------enigA4F101819F445385773CEE1F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk155EEACgkQitSsb3rl5xSR3gCguuMS7rnCWY0vFrgjWxSfOmyr Cy0An2XLZY6thx3PLrthrh8d5l1qqy1L =22fk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigA4F101819F445385773CEE1F--