From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@kernel.org, Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] block: fix mis-synchronisation in blkdev_issue_zeroout()
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 10:29:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D79EB7B.10702@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1299830784-6622-1-git-send-email-lczerner@redhat.com>
On 2011-03-11 09:06, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> BZ29402
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29402
>
> We can hit serious mis-synchronization in bio completion path of
> blkdev_issue_zeroout() leading to a panic.
>
> The problem is that when we are going to wait_for_completion() in
> blkdev_issue_zeroout() we check if the bb.done equals issued (number of
> submitted bios). If it does, we can skip the wait_for_completition()
> and just out of the function since there is nothing to wait for.
> However, there is a ordering problem because bio_batch_end_io() is
> calling atomic_inc(&bb->done) before complete(), hence it might seem to
> blkdev_issue_zeroout() that all bios has been completed and exit. At
> this point when bio_batch_end_io() is going to call complete(bb->wait),
> bb and wait does not longer exist since it was allocated on stack in
> blkdev_issue_zeroout() ==> panic!
>
> (thread 1) (thread 2)
> bio_batch_end_io() blkdev_issue_zeroout()
> if(bb) { ...
> if (bb->end_io) ...
> bb->end_io(bio, err); ...
> atomic_inc(&bb->done); ...
> ... while (issued != atomic_read(&bb.done))
> ... (let issued == bb.done)
> ... (do the rest of the function)
> ... return ret;
> complete(bb->wait);
> ^^^^^^^^
> panic
>
> We can fix this easily by simplifying bio_batch and completion counting.
>
> Also remove bio_end_io_t *end_io since it is not used.
Thanks Lukas, I'll expedite this for 2.6.38!
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-11 9:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-11 8:06 [PATCH v2] block: fix mis-synchronisation in blkdev_issue_zeroout() Lukas Czerner
2011-03-11 9:29 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2011-03-11 14:23 ` Jeff Moyer
2011-03-11 14:31 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-03-11 14:36 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D79EB7B.10702@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.