From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-px0-f169.google.com (mail-px0-f169.google.com [209.85.212.169]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02CD34C80050 for ; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 11:25:16 -0600 (CST) Authentication-Results: mx1.pokylinux.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; insecure key) header.i=@gmail.com; x-dkim-adsp=none (insecure policy) Received: by pxi9 with SMTP id 9so880909pxi.28 for ; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 09:25:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=EaOVpBXR/vPXaE0AqaNcNzKpBm7mjib2qlCo187OJUI=; b=sc8MKl8AfAa3vqlJhelfxgURy87pSAVBDzKnz03E+wFGp7cmbv+qfhnyT5qY46ru3x f3esdtRRaaFYFZBhKxcieJ2TLr7TXPmupPzRa3/kSm30zhzoeYysEhS5dyaYnknXgQbO nknZf7e0SSZan/p11e42CWX7wPs3fDMUKVgGs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Owt10h+qD9UhaxWeD2fmBF0G29Aj3xHlTcrEjyWCSnBDFGumF7QE3nnK/d1BAJYNl5 8fBn7t6Yw1D4zjCCuUov6HNWN9cdAroTEgm3mtNtQfXj7et6aBqgMQGO3D1lvuTB9Jsu +MA6NYKTVpOBUh7v6FYr50qeH0kJDVBbKVNe4= Received: by 10.142.151.4 with SMTP id y4mr8945246wfd.133.1299950715886; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 09:25:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.70] (99-57-141-118.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [99.57.141.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s41sm7237210wfc.3.2011.03.12.09.25.13 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 12 Mar 2011 09:25:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D7BAC70.5060401@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 09:25:04 -0800 From: Khem Raj User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: yocto@yoctoproject.org References: <4D7B35CC.3070900@linux.intel.com> <24F5F982-85A4-413E-BB66-55244E2701D7@dominion.thruhere.net> <4D7B9DB4.6070105@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <4D7B9DB4.6070105@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: Please add build ID to bugs X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 17:25:17 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 3/12/2011 8:22 AM, Darren Hart wrote: > > > On 03/12/2011 01:12 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: >> >> Op 12 mrt 2011, om 09:58 heeft Darren Hart het volgende geschreven: >> >>> On 03/07/2011 11:05 AM, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote: >>>> Hi all >>>> >>>> I have added the following item to the Bugzilla guidelines: >>>> >>>> *IMPORTANT*: please include the build/commit ID as reported by BitBake, so may be it should be termed as 'Build Configuration' instead >>> >>> s/BitBake/git/ I presume? >> >> I think he means this one: >> >> Build Configuration: >> BB_VERSION = "1.13.0" >> METADATA_BRANCH = "org.openembedded.dev" >> METADATA_REVISION = "0671ad1" >> TARGET_ARCH = "arm" >> TARGET_OS = "linux-gnueabi" >> MACHINE = "beagleboard" >> DISTRO = "angstrom" >> DISTRO_VERSION = "v20110312" >> TARGET_FPU = "hard" >> > > Ah, yes, that makes more sense. >