From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from proxy.dresearch.de ([87.193.137.100] helo=mail.dresearch.de) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Pz1tP-0004RI-0O for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 08:08:39 +0100 Received: from exchange.intern.dresearch.de (owa.xfer-intern.dresearch.de [192.168.32.16]) by mail.dresearch.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82428491282; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 08:06:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([10.32.10.2]) by exchange.intern.dresearch.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 14 Mar 2011 08:06:58 +0100 Message-ID: <4D7DBE92.5010906@dresearch.de> Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 08:06:58 +0100 From: Steffen Sledz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1299841477-23487-1-git-send-email-sledz@dresearch.de> <4D7A4566.6070607@dresearch.de> <20110312000524.GE5603@sakrah.homelinux.org> In-Reply-To: <20110312000524.GE5603@sakrah.homelinux.org> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Mar 2011 07:06:58.0668 (UTC) FILETIME=[68DD42C0:01CBE216] Subject: Re: [PATCH] net-snmp: disable libnl use X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 07:08:39 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 12.03.2011 01:05, schrieb Khem Raj: > On (11/03/11 16:53), Steffen Sledz wrote: >> On 03/11/2011 02:05 PM, Koen Kooi wrote: >>> On 11-03-11 12:04, Steffen Sledz wrote: >>>> Fixes compile error >>> >>>> | ./.libs/libnetsnmpmibs.so: undefined reference to `nl_handle_destr= oy' >>>> | ./.libs/libnetsnmpmibs.so: undefined reference to `nl_handle_alloc= ' >>> >>>> which occurred sometimes depending on build order (not in clean pack= age >>>> only builds). >>> >>> What features do we loose when disabling netlink support? I'd rather = get >>> the libnl recipe fixed (e.g. static lib only) instead of hacking the >>> dependants. >> >> I'm not sure. >> >> But there is no dependency to libnl. If *libnl was not built before ne= t-snmp* the autotools/configure does not find it. So in that case libnl w= asn't used anyway. >> >> Just in case *it was built before* net-snmp tries to use it and hits t= he mentioned error. >=20 > So assuming that successful builds before did not link in libnl this > seems ok to me. Can i take that as an ACK? Steffen --=20 DResearch Fahrzeugelektronik GmbH Otto-Schmirgal-Str. 3, 10319 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 515932-237 mailto:sledz@DResearch.de Fax: +49 30 515932-299 Gesch=C3=A4ftsf=C3=BChrer: Dr. Michael Weber, Werner M=C3=B6gle; Amtsgericht Berlin Charlottenburg; HRB 130120 B; Ust.-IDNr. DE273952058