From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx13.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.18]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p2EGlHaR026644 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 12:47:17 -0400 Received: from eastrmfepo202.cox.net (eastrmfepo202.cox.net [68.230.241.217]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2EGl615007158 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 12:47:07 -0400 Received: from eastrmimpo02.cox.net ([68.1.16.120]) by eastrmfepo202.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.04.00 201-2260-137-20101110) with ESMTP id <20110314164706.MYHT32466.eastrmfepo202.cox.net@eastrmimpo02.cox.net> for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 12:47:06 -0400 Message-ID: <4D7E4689.9060300@cox.net> Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 11:47:05 -0500 From: Ron Johnson MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [linux-lvm] Advanced Format disks mixed with regular disks? Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: linux-lvm@redhat.com Hi, Is there any concern with mixing 4KB-sector drives with 512-byte sector drives in the same LV? Sincerely, Ron -- I prefer banana-flavored energy bars made from tofu.