Re: [PATCH 1/4] netfilter: xt_connlimit: fix daddr connlimit in SNAT scenario

[Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>]

On 15.03.2011 03:05, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Tuesday 2011-03-15 02:30, Changli Gao wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> The original tuple may not be updated, but the reply tuple is.
>>> And we are taking the reply tuple in
>>>
>>>        tuple_ptr = &ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].tuple;
>>>
>>> which is subsequently copied to conn->tuple on the first invocation.
>>>
>>> Afterwards, SNAT will update ct->tuplehash[reply].tuple, and so
>>> conn->tuple is outdated. Calling nf_conntrack_find_get(conn->tuple)
>>> in count_them would then fail, would it not?
>>>
>>
>> After my patch, tuple is only used to look up the corresponding
>> conntrack.
> 
> Ok, the patch may be applied. Somehow I was under the impression
> addr was extracted from tuple_ptr, but it is, in fact, not.
> 

OK, thanks, I'll apply patches 1-4.