From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: Vishwanath Sripathy <vishwanath.bs@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] OMAP PM: Voltage layer clean up
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 06:48:35 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D800FEB.9010809@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <704e43df1ea426a676115cd34b93649e@mail.gmail.com>
Vishwanath Sripathy wrote, on 03/15/2011 09:36 PM:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Menon, Nishanth [mailto:nm@ti.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 8:38 PM
>> To: Vishwanath BS
>> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] OMAP PM: Voltage layer clean up
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 20:03, Vishwanath BS
>> <vishwanath.bs@ti.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> This patch series attempts to do some more clean up on OMAP Voltage
>> layer on top
>>> of the clean up done by Paul as part of
>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/591421/
>>>
>>> These patches are generated against latest omap-for-linus branch on
>> Tony's tree
>>> (commit id: 05f689400ea5fa3d71af82f910c8b140f87ad1f3) and tested
>> on OMAP ZOOM3
>>> and OMAP4430 SDP with Smartreflex enabled.
>>>
>>> Vishwanath BS (3):
>>> OMAP PM: Seggregate Voltage layer parameters
>>> OMAP PM: Add support for bypassing VP/VC in Voltage layer
>>> OMAP PM: Add Board specific parameters for OMAP Volatge layer
>>
>> I dont really see why I need to keep fixing your $subjects, but here
>> again,
>> all $subjects, OMAP3+: PM: makes more sense
> This is not OMAP3 specific. It applies to OMAP4 as well.
which is why i recommended OMAP3+ and not OMAP3
>>
>>>
>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c | 52 +++++++
>>
>> Curious if Panda and other OMAP3 platforms where considered.
> That's TODO as per my Patch3 commit log.
would've been nice to see that info in 0/3
[..]
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-16 1:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-15 14:33 [RFC][PATCH 0/3] OMAP PM: Voltage layer clean up Vishwanath BS
2011-03-15 14:33 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/3] OMAP PM: Seggregate Voltage layer parameters Vishwanath BS
2011-03-17 23:20 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-03-18 12:00 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-04-02 0:03 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-05 7:08 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-04-05 18:16 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-03-15 14:33 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/3] OMAP PM: Add support for bypassing VP/VC in Voltage layer Vishwanath BS
2011-03-15 15:16 ` Menon, Nishanth
2011-03-15 16:14 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-03-16 6:58 ` Premi, Sanjeev
2011-03-15 14:33 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/3] OMAP PM: Add Board specific parameters for OMAP Volatge layer Vishwanath BS
2011-03-15 15:38 ` Menon, Nishanth
2011-03-16 5:53 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-03-17 23:25 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-03-15 15:07 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/3] OMAP PM: Voltage layer clean up Menon, Nishanth
2011-03-15 16:06 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-03-16 1:18 ` Nishanth Menon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D800FEB.9010809@ti.com \
--to=nm@ti.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vishwanath.bs@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.