From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pv0-f175.google.com ([74.125.83.175]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Pzv2N-0007k7-5r for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:01:36 +0100 Received: by pvc30 with SMTP id 30so293438pvc.6 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 10:59:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Q+Sm+CS2JmMtQ+Ff/YAOUunc6q0nRJ7EHqj2dQ3pOlU=; b=hVCIVJew1zWLF5n++0ujSSO4149bAPYR5y6Uiu7U3tJy5Ltea9TiLkKezJEvvpcvPc 8x/NRIIlRgCGmeexFqcjjpb/3NuvTVlYcFUG08TaH0diaAbgEQEuJPVV4TUzpRHhCWNG 1B/Gd3v0+ewpWwgOihkbNH7+CPi0GRlGRjQZQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=EbMdy1ToqSG5+QxYakxm8gUGpxEWiQPRrxu7OATpTTGBeJUxxwau9MV2lNexzqaTF6 a8d3UmIXM8wZCnP5sykCSwJ5h0R9bHZtVjL2U1WsBwFHFT39efgawkDCU7LzfeKIDoP6 Oia/S33nUcOenfdoYascLCPVn748QFreF/f1g= Received: by 10.143.24.39 with SMTP id b39mr155862wfj.341.1300298390636; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 10:59:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.70] (99-57-141-118.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [99.57.141.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n4sm1434544wfl.2.2011.03.16.10.59.47 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 16 Mar 2011 10:59:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4D80FA85.7030903@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 10:59:33 -0700 From: Khem Raj User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1300264546.3840.9.camel@mattotaupa> <4D80791E.2040803@gmail.com> <1300265560.3840.10.camel@mattotaupa> <1300269370.2132.13010.camel@phil-desktop> <1300282755.3840.69.camel@mattotaupa> <1300284412.2132.13266.camel@phil-desktop> <1300287990.3840.85.camel@mattotaupa> In-Reply-To: <1300287990.3840.85.camel@mattotaupa> Subject: Re: minimal-uclibc: gnutls-2.10.4-r11.0: task compile fails with `make[4]: *** [coding.lo] Error 1` X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 18:01:37 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 3/16/2011 8:06 AM, Paul Menzel wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 16.03.2011, 14:06 +0000 schrieb Phil Blundell: >> On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 14:39 +0100, Paul Menzel wrote: >>> arm-oe-linux-uclibceabi-gcc -march=armv7-a -mtune=cortex-a8 -mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=softfp -mthumb-interwork -mno-thumb --sysroot=/oe/build-minimal-uclibc/minimal-uclibc-dev/sysroots/armv7a-oe-linux-uclibceabi -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -DASN1_BUILDING -I./../gl -I./../gl -I./.. -fexpensive-optimizations -fomit-frame-pointer -frename-registers -Os -pipe -g -MT coding.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/coding.Tpo -c coding.c -o coding.o >>> coding.c: In function 'asn1_length_der': >>> coding.c:101:1: internal compiler error: in dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr, at dwarf2out.c:2221 >>> Please submit a full bug report, >>> with preprocessed source if appropriate. >>> See for instructions. >>> {standard input}: Assembler messages: >> >> > From the looks of the error, you could probably work around the crash by >> compiling without -g. > > Thanks, that worked. > >> Obviously you'd lose debuggability but that might or might not be a >> problem for your particular use case. > > Well, I am just build testing. > >>> I am wondering if the latest GCC 4.5 changes are causing this, but as >>> always this is just an uneducated guess. >> >> Could be. Or it's possible that the bug has been latent for a long time >> and has just been tickled by a recent change to CFLAGS. I think the >> inclusion of -g in the default opts is a relatively recent innovation. > > I think it worked before last Friday, i. e., before the GCC 4.5 updates. Yes and the fix was to address exact same problem but reported in another recipe. So it fixed things but partially. Let me try to poke around a bit > >> You could bisect the recent changes if you want but, unless you want to >> debug this for yourself, the best way to proceed is probably to follow >> the directions in the error message and submit a bug report to upstream >> GCC. > > I will see, if or when I will get to that and report back. > > > Thanks, > > Paul > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel