From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans de Goede Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 11:28:51 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] Call for 3.3.0 Message-Id: <4D81F073.1020908@redhat.com> List-Id: References: <20110316224142.0493f53b@endymion.delvare> In-Reply-To: <20110316224142.0493f53b@endymion.delvare> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 03/17/2011 10:59 AM, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:26:57 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 03/16/2011 10:41 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Last release of lm-sensors (3.2.0) was in October 2010, 5 months ago. >>> The list of changes since then is getting large, so it's time for a new >>> release. The changes are important enough that I would go for 3.3.0 >>> rather than 3.2.1 as originally planned. >>> >>> This decision is motivated by the long list of new attributes and even >>> new sensor types handled by libsensors and sensors. Other changes worth >>> mentioning are Guenter's generic code to display limit values in >>> "sensors", the removal of some arbitrary limits in libsensors attribute >>> enumeration code, and the usual addition of many new devices to >>> sensors-detect. >>> >>> The planned schedule is as follows: >>> * Saturday, March 19th, 2011: SVN freeze >> >> I have not been able to make time yet to add detection of the new >> models handled by f71882fg, in as far as they are not already >> present (some probably are haven't checked). I think it would be >> good to have this in place before 3.3.0. Note I cannot test >> these changes, so they might as well be done by someone else >> (hint hint). > > Hint received. Here's the patch I have come up with: > Looks good, thanks. Regards, Hans _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors