All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Naga Chumbalkar <nagananda.chumbalkar@hp.com>
Cc: jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, rjw@sisk.pl, mjg59@srcf.ucam.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2]: PCI: PCIe links may not get configured for ASPM under POWERSAVE mode
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 14:29:16 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D82EDAC.8070307@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110318041801.2349.33357.sendpatchset@nchumbalkar.americas.hpqcorp.net>

(2011/03/18 13:21), Naga Chumbalkar wrote:
> v2 ->  v1:
> 	. Kept the logic in pci_raw_set_power_state
> 	. Changed the ASPM enabling logic
> 	. Modified the text that describes the problem
>
> v1	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-pci&m=130013164703283&w=2
>
> The assumption made in commit 41cd766b065970ff6f6c89dd1cf55fa706c84a3d
> (PCI: Don't enable aspm before drivers have had a chance to veto it) that
> pci_enable_device() will result in re-configuring ASPM when aspm_policy is
> POWERSAVE is no longer valid.  This is due to commit
> 97c145f7c87453cec90e91238fba5fe2c1561b32 (PCI: read current power state
> at enable time) which resets dev->current_state to D0. This makes the
> equality check (below) become true, so pcie_aspm_pm_state_change() never
> gets called.
> ./drivers/pci/pci.c: pci_raw_set_pci_power_state()
> 546         /* Check if we're already there */
> 547         if (dev->current_state == state)
> 548                 return 0;
>
> So OSPM doesnn't configure the PCIe links for ASPM.
>
> The patch below does the following:
> At the end of each Root Bridge scan make a call to configure ASPM when the
> ASPM policy is set to "powersave" mode. Note that if a previous pass had
> completed the configuration for all devices under that Bridge then the
> configuration will not take place again because pcie_config_aspm_link()
> checks to see if the link is already in the requested state.
> We won't reconfigure ASPM when _OSC control is not granted.

Which _OSC controls do we need for configuring ASPM?

Regards,
Kenji Kaneshige


  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-18  5:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-18  4:21 [RFC][PATCH v2]: PCI: PCIe links may not get configured for ASPM under POWERSAVE mode Naga Chumbalkar
2011-03-18  5:29 ` Kenji Kaneshige [this message]
2011-03-18 14:52   ` Chumbalkar, Nagananda
2011-03-22  2:16     ` Kenji Kaneshige
2011-03-18 17:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D82EDAC.8070307@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=nagananda.chumbalkar@hp.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.