From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from www.xora.org.uk ([80.68.91.202] helo=xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0inu-0002ZO-UJ for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 00:09:58 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9E17A493F for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 23:08:10 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk Received: from xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BdGcV337vVyS for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 23:08:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (188-220-34-37.zone11.bethere.co.uk [188.220.34.37]) by xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 98A9BA493C for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 23:08:09 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <4D83E632.2040701@xora.org.uk> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 23:09:38 +0000 From: Graeme Gregory User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <6F3B187F-5497-4504-9EEB-99204CCC815B@vanille-media.de> In-Reply-To: <6F3B187F-5497-4504-9EEB-99204CCC815B@vanille-media.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Subject: Re: blacklist.bbclass X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 23:09:59 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 18/03/2011 19:24, Dr. Michael Lauer wrote: > Salut, > > the blacklisting of packages as found in angstrom.bbclass > is pretty helpful and would be beneficial to all kinds > of distribution configurations in OE. Would there be > a strong objection of renaming this to blacklist.bbclass? > > Copying, of course, is also a possibility, but > in my opinion it would only be the second best choice. > As the author I object to renaming it. We have played this rename game before and Im still not happy with the results of the last time. I also object on the grounds of the amount of abuse I got from some other distro maintainers for implementing this, which is the reason it is called angstrom.bbclass. Graeme