From: Piotr Krukowiecki <piotr.krukowiecki@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>, Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] git bisect run: exit code 126 and 127 abort the run
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 16:18:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D84C960.3010401@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vei654omv.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Those codes are reserved by POSIX to indicate
"command not executable" and "command not found":
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html#tag_18_08_02
Bisect used to treat them as codes returned by user
to mark a "bad" code.
With that approach it was not possible to differentiate
between codes returned by the user and codes returned by
shell (which is likely a sign of a poorly written test
script).
Another minor problem was lack of consistency in exit codes.
A "bad" code was marked by any value in range 1-124,126-127
and the gap in the middle looked weird.
Change the meaning of exit codes 126 and 127 to
"abort the bisect process" to fixes the above problems.
Signed-off-by: Piotr Krukowiecki <piotr.krukowiecki@gmail.com>
---
git-bisect.sh | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
W dniu 17.03.2011 18:56, Junio C Hamano pisze:
> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
>
>> 2. If we do detect such a mishap, I'm not sure that "indeterminate
>> result" is necessarily the best result, as that will just keep
>> trying more and more commits without success. It is more likely a
>> sign of a poorly written test script, and the best thing we could
>> do is die and say "your test script looks buggy".
>
> Exactly. I agree "Aborting the bisect as run-script is a crap" is the
> right thing to do here.
Here's a patch. Next one changes git-bisect.txt
There's also Documentation/git-bisect-lk2009.txt which talks about exit
codes and should be changed somehow. As I understand it's a quote from an
email so I don't know if it should be edited in place, or should a note
be added at beginning?
(And again my patch has commit message longer than the changes...
Now I understand why in-code documentation is lacking - after writing
lengthy commit message documenting the code is just too much ;) )
diff --git a/git-bisect.sh b/git-bisect.sh
index c21e33c..9ca4852 100755
--- a/git-bisect.sh
+++ b/git-bisect.sh
@@ -376,9 +376,9 @@ bisect_run () {
res=$?
# Check for really bad run error.
- if [ $res -lt 0 -o $res -ge 128 ]; then
+ if [ $res -lt 0 -o $res -ge 126 ]; then
echo >&2 "bisect run failed:"
- echo >&2 "exit code $res from '$@' is < 0 or >= 128"
+ echo >&2 "exit code $res from '$@' is < 0 or >= 126"
exit $res
fi
--
1.7.1
--
Piotr Krukowiecki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-19 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-16 20:44 git bisect code 125 - "WFT?" Piotr Krukowiecki
2011-03-16 21:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-03-16 22:06 ` Piotr Krukowiecki
2011-03-17 6:55 ` Johannes Sixt
2011-03-17 7:27 ` Jeff King
2011-03-17 17:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-03-19 15:18 ` Piotr Krukowiecki [this message]
2011-03-19 15:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] bisect documentation: exit codes 126,127 abort bisect Piotr Krukowiecki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D84C960.3010401@gmail.com \
--to=piotr.krukowiecki@gmail.com \
--cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.