From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from www.xora.org.uk ([80.68.91.202] helo=xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q153N-0005yV-Jr for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 23:55:26 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id D70F0A4952 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 22:53:39 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk Received: from xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X1Fk4iP6mF-q for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 22:53:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (188-220-34-37.zone11.bethere.co.uk [188.220.34.37]) by xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 02220A4950 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 22:53:38 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <4D8533F3.7090301@xora.org.uk> Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 22:53:39 +0000 From: Graeme Gregory User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <6F3B187F-5497-4504-9EEB-99204CCC815B@vanille-media.de> <4D83E632.2040701@xora.org.uk> <4D8530EF.5040307@mentor.com> In-Reply-To: <4D8530EF.5040307@mentor.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Subject: Re: blacklist.bbclass X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 22:55:26 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 19/03/2011 22:40, Tom Rini wrote: > On 03/18/2011 04:09 PM, Graeme Gregory wrote: >> On 18/03/2011 19:24, Dr. Michael Lauer wrote: >>> Salut, >>> >>> the blacklisting of packages as found in angstrom.bbclass >>> is pretty helpful and would be beneficial to all kinds >>> of distribution configurations in OE. Would there be >>> a strong objection of renaming this to blacklist.bbclass? >>> >>> Copying, of course, is also a possibility, but >>> in my opinion it would only be the second best choice. >>> >> As the author I object to renaming it. >> >> We have played this rename game before and Im still not happy with the >> results of the last time. >> >> I also object on the grounds of the amount of abuse I got from some >> other distro maintainers for implementing this, which is the reason it >> is called angstrom.bbclass. > > OK. Can we change the message so it says ${DISTRO} doesn't support, > rather than Angstrom doesn't support? > Heh, your slow, do a git pull :-) Graeme