From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.172]:45444 "EHLO ns3.lanforge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756578Ab1CWTXz (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:23:55 -0400 Received: from [192.168.100.195] (firewall.candelatech.com [70.89.124.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns3.lanforge.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p2NJNskr004266 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 12:23:55 -0700 Message-ID: <4D8A48CA.2050307@candelatech.com> Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 12:23:54 -0700 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: ath5k and power-save Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: As far as I can tell, ath5k doesn't support power-save. I did see posts talking about ath5k and power save from a year or so ago, so I wanted to check to make sure there isn't a regression? Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com