From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:17:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-ey0-f177.google.com ([209.85.215.177]:36959 "EHLO mail-ey0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S1491112Ab1CXMQ6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:16:58 +0100 Received: by eyh6 with SMTP id 6so2578943eyh.36 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 05:16:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.14.9 with SMTP id e9mr3556677eba.9.1300969012452; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 05:16:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([91.79.104.70]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b52sm4456721eei.8.2011.03.24.05.16.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 24 Mar 2011 05:16:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4D8B35DA.6020804@mvista.com> Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:15:22 +0300 From: Sergei Shtylyov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Gleixner CC: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Ralf Baechle , Lars-Peter Clausen Subject: Re: [patch 10/38] MIPS: JZ4740: GPIO: Use shared irq chip for all gpios References: <20110323210437.398062704@linutronix.de> <20110323210535.525705907@linutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <20110323210535.525705907@linutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 29478 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: sshtylyov@mvista.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Hello. On 24-03-2011 0:08, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Currently there is one irq_chip per gpio_chip with the only difference > being the name. Since the information whether the irq belong to GPIO > bank A, B, C or D is not that important rewrite the code to simply use > a single irq_chip for all gpio_chips. > Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner If these 2 patches are from Lars, shouldn't there be "From: Lars-Peter Clausen " line at the start of the patches? WBR, Sergei