From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>, Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] perf, x86: P4 PMU - Add missing read of a counter before test
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:46:40 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D8B7570.40101@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110324163332.GA2414@elte.hu>
On 03/24/2011 07:33 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 03/24/2011 11:48 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>
>>> * Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Don, I've added yours SOB, ok? (The patch is attached to avoid
>>>> space/tabs problem
>>>> due to web-mail client)
>>>
>>> The patch lacks a proper description about the motivation and effects of the
>>> patch.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Ingo
>>
>> Ingo, does this one looks better?
>>
>> ---
>> From: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH -tip] perf, x86: P4 PMU - Add missing read of MSR register to catch unflagged overflows
>>
>> The read of a proper MSR register was missed so instead of a counter the
>> configration register is tested (it has ARCH_P4_UNFLAGGED_BIT always cleared)
>> and unflagged overflows never have been catched. Fix it by reading a proper
>> MSR register.
>
> So what effect does this have on the regular perf user? Please try to describe
> the real-life effect of the bug/problem fixed here.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
Unflagged overflows never have been catched due to missed read of a register which
is to signalize about it, and as result unknown nmi may happen leading to
"Dazen and confused" message. That is what supposed to be in changelog?
--
Cyrill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-24 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-24 8:29 [PATCH -tip] perf, x86: P4 PMU - Add missing read of a counter before test Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-03-24 8:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-24 9:33 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-03-24 15:38 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-03-24 16:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-24 16:46 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2011-03-24 16:47 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-03-24 16:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-24 17:06 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-03-24 18:22 ` Don Zickus
2011-03-24 18:26 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-03-24 20:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-24 12:28 ` Don Zickus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D8B7570.40101@gmail.com \
--to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.