From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57780 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q46pZ-00022o-69 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 03:25:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q46pX-0007lu-8O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 03:25:40 -0400 Received: from mail-iy0-f173.google.com ([209.85.210.173]:52031) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q46pX-0007lq-1h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 03:25:39 -0400 Received: by iym10 with SMTP id 10so3362521iym.4 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 00:25:37 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <4D9037EE.8000808@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 09:25:34 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/4] Introduce machine state List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Blue Swirl Cc: qemu-devel On 03/26/2011 11:28 PM, Blue Swirl wrote: > Move generic machine state to machine-state.h, adjust > users. What's the distinction between vm state and machine state? Perhaps your vm state is more appropriately called "emulator state" (i.e. sits between host and vm), and machine state is actually "vm state"? BTW, uuid should be in machine state rather than (your definition of) vm state. Paolo