From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Christian Brandt <brandtc@psi5.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fsck.ext4 taking months
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:07:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D90A42A.3070401@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D8F1F75.8010201@psi5.com>
On 3/27/11 6:28 AM, Christian Brandt wrote:
> Situation: External 500GB drive holds lots of snapshots using lots of
> hard links made by rsync --link-dest. The controller went bad and
> destroyed superblock and directory structures. The drive contains
> roughly a million files and four complete directory-tree-snapshots with
> each roughly a million hardlinks.
>
> Tried
>
> e2fsck 1.41.12 (17-May-2010)
> Benutze EXT2FS Library version 1.41.12, 17-May-2010
>
> e2fsck 1.41.11 (14-Mar-2010)
> Benutze EXT2FS Library version 1.41.11, 14-Mar-2010
>
> Symptoms: fsck.ext4 -y -f takes nearly a month to fix the structures on
> a P4@2,8Ghz, with very little access to the drive and 100% cpu use.
Does that mean very little access to -this- drive or to -any- drive?
IOW, are you swapping madly?
-Eric
> output of fsck looks much like this:
>
> File ??? (Inode #123456, modify time Wed Jul 22 16:20:23 2009)
> block Nr. 6144 double block(s), used with four file(s):
> <filesystem metadata>
> ??? (Inode #123457, mod time Wed Jul 22 16:20:23 2009)
> ??? (Inode #123458, mod time Wed Jul 22 16:20:23 2009)
> ...
> multiply claimed block map? Yes
>
> Is there an adhoc method of getting my data back faster?
>
> Is the slow performance with lots of hard links a known issue?
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-28 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-27 11:28 fsck.ext4 taking months Christian Brandt
2011-03-28 14:43 ` Ric Wheeler
2011-03-29 6:03 ` Rogier Wolff
2011-03-29 20:26 ` Christian Brandt
2011-03-30 8:45 ` Rogier Wolff
2011-03-29 20:21 ` Christian Brandt
2011-03-28 15:07 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2011-03-28 15:47 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-03-29 22:02 ` Christian Brandt
2011-03-30 8:34 ` Rogier Wolff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D90A42A.3070401@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=brandtc@psi5.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.