From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan-fJ+pQTUTwRTk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
socketcan-users-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org,
Wolfgang Grandegger <wg-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: poll broken (for can)
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 21:32:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D90E262.1090201@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D90CB17.4030205-fJ+pQTUTwRTk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2619 bytes --]
On 03/28/2011 07:53 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> On 28.03.2011 18:13, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>> On 03/28/2011 05:55 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>>>> BTW: I figured out why poll() wakes you up but the next write will fail
>>>> with -ENOBUFS again.
>>>
>>> Ah, I'm curious? I also did realize that poll does burn CPU cycles
>>> (instead of waiting).
>>
>> The poll callback checks if the used memory is less than the half of per
>> socket snd buffer (IIRC ~60K). See:
>>
>> datagram_poll (http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.38/net/core/datagram.c#L737)
>> sock_writeable (http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.38/include/net/sock.h#L1618)
>>
>> Because the size of a can frame (+the skb overhead) is much less then
>> the ethernet frame (+overhead) the default value for the snd buffer is
>> too big for can.
>>
>> We get the -ENOBUF from write() if the tx_queue_len (default 10) is
>> exceeded.
>>
>> http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.38/drivers/net/can/dev.c#L435
>> http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.38/net/can/af_can.c#L268
>>
>
> What would be your suggestion? Decreasing the socket send buffer for CAN by
> default?
I haven't done any testing.....As far as I understand the code, we can
a) increase the default tx_queue_len and/or
b) decrease the default snd buffer size.
Note: a) is a per device setting whereas b) is a per socket setting.
With the current settings the -ENOBUF is triggered if we have X unsend
can frames (per device) where X equals the tx_queue_len. This means
using 5 applications, it about 2 queued (i.e. unsent) frames per app and
device.
If we increase the tx_queue_len to a high value (via ifconfig), so that
the snd buffer is fully used, before the tx_queue_len is exceeded the
write system call will block, (or return -EAGAIN of opened non
blocking). At least the last time I've done this.
I think solution b) would lead to a similar behavioural change.
What do we really want to specify?
Something like: queue up to X frames per socket and queue only Y frames
per device. Where Y = X * n and n is "I don't know yet"?
Y is simple, it's the tx_queue_len. But X is more complicated. The can
frames have non constant length (i.e. dlc) and I'm not sure that the
netdev people say if we misuse the sock_alloc_send_pskb() for our
tx-flow-control :)
Cheers, Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 262 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 191 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Socketcan-users mailing list
Socketcan-users-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-users
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-28 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1301321142.9519.10.camel@lukonin-pc>
[not found] ` <4D90A7E9.1080804@grandegger.com>
[not found] ` <4D90AA8A.9010804@pengutronix.de>
[not found] ` <4D90AF67.1080405@grandegger.com>
[not found] ` <4D90AF67.1080405-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org>
2011-03-28 16:13 ` poll broken (for can) (was: Re: Multiple programs trying to access the socket) Marc Kleine-Budde
[not found] ` <4D90B3B0.2010401-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-03-28 17:53 ` poll broken (for can) Oliver Hartkopp
[not found] ` <4D90CB17.4030205-fJ+pQTUTwRTk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-03-28 19:32 ` Marc Kleine-Budde [this message]
[not found] ` <4D90E262.1090201-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-03-29 20:03 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2011-03-30 7:05 ` David Miller
2011-03-30 7:46 ` [Socketcan-users] " Kurt Van Dijck
[not found] ` <4D923B00.20500-fJ+pQTUTwRTk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-03-30 8:53 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D90E262.1090201@pengutronix.de \
--to=mkl-bicnvbalz9megne8c9+irq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=Netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=socketcan-fJ+pQTUTwRTk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=socketcan-users-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wg-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.