From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay1.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.131]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4IFi-0006dR-IY; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 21:37:26 +0200 Received: from svr-orw-exc-10.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.58]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1Q4IDp-0007Rl-6L from Tom_Rini@mentor.com ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:35:29 -0700 Received: from SVR-ORW-FEM-05.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.97.43]) by SVR-ORW-EXC-10.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:34:05 -0700 Received: from [172.30.80.76] (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-05 (147.34.97.43) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.270.1; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:35:27 -0700 Message-ID: <4D90E2FA.7020603@mentor.com> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:35:22 -0700 From: Tom Rini Organization: Mentor Graphics Corporation User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: , References: <4D7E3B34.5050100@mentor.com> In-Reply-To: <4D7E3B34.5050100@mentor.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Mar 2011 19:34:05.0927 (UTC) FILETIME=[19C6A770:01CBED7F] Subject: Re: Discussion: Version retention policy in oe-core X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 19:37:26 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/14/2011 08:58 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > Hi all, > > The TSC has discussed this item at the request of the community and has > come up with the following recommendation which we are looking for > feedback (positive/negative/neutral) before putting this up on the wiki. Based on feedback I have placed this into http://wiki.openembedded.org/index.php/Version_Retention_Policy If any feedback is not incorporated it was unintentional and please let me know so I can update it. My reading of the feedback however came down to: - - Definition of what packages are in what category needs to be define (separate task) - - "Need to see how it works in practice" (agreed!). Thanks all! - -- Tom Rini Mentor Graphics Corporation -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNkOL6AAoJEI4NMjfc3nJxkFkIAM39xQlKT6/0CfVxS+KS6dty AEpnVVXH6xfguY2oqYSi9pq0slt0IY5OQMl9LB8qSUU0KVZuxeTsXIAJLk6s2VN8 8/Q4kO8tgq0Y2c7m8xzXUka2pYQO9PgGfkibSVMdnmLLTDYaTa77tblLGYFqkVwq g75s0/iJFyVvILhyApwSBnWdy6oV85KBm02ADcEFANCtsiL8QHgp2PMbWCe2QvcE yVQ3/8tR9XZ3Niz9zzE7MvCkbds8DAJRc5tb8M4UzJQyUp+QFcb6awiBoOyhfr4f R2brcosDDgb3bIZWuC9Ks/Cq1rqjEpkHXDU3NjvoxjVZlBGCQ/xq1BnEj9pQARY= =mo/a -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----