From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:31:39 +0200
Subject: [ath9k-devel] how to config AR9280 for operation as 1X1 or
 other ideas
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=pzqvLy=JL9YPSJz8+VOhrsYLHZWj+MP4g8cSF@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTikmWb00r5p2OVOfqY17n+CUsqyfbNeM_zPUXTsa@mail.gmail.com>	<4D91EE58.5050603@openwrt.org>
	<AANLkTi=pzqvLy=JL9YPSJz8+VOhrsYLHZWj+MP4g8cSF@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4D91FB5B.50108@openwrt.org>
List-Id: <ath9k-devel.lists.ath9k.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org

On 2011-03-29 5:08 PM, Larry Vaden wrote:
> Felix,
>
> You can not know how appreciative this rural ISP is of your reply.
Great. I work with a few companies involved in either deploying outdoor 
links or making software for it, so I'm really interested in any 
feedback related to how ath9k performs in such setups.

> To prove Will Rogers was correct about ~ "we're all ignorant, just
> about different things,"
>
> do you wish that the chainmask be changed on only the AP or on both
> the AP and the CPE?
Both.

- Felix