From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felix Fietkau Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:20:15 +0200 Subject: [ath9k-devel] how to config AR9280 for operation as 1X1 or other ideas In-Reply-To: References: <4D91EE58.5050603@openwrt.org> <4D91FA8B.5050606@openwrt.org> Message-ID: <4D9214CF.5060109@openwrt.org> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org On 2011-03-29 6:25 PM, Larry Vaden wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote: > >>>20% busy time with only about 5% combined rx/tx time, I guess there's some >>> interference on the channel which might be messing with your signal as well. >>> Please try different channels and compare the survey output there. > > Felix, > > Is there a way in OpenWrt for the M900 series to shift the channels > to, e.g., 909 and 914 MHz? Not at the moment. It'll use 900 mhz even though it's displaying a different frequency, but right now there are no tables for taking the frequency shift of the hardware into account. > Those fs seemed most stable when running AirOS ... (read: no > spontaneous reboots occurred at those fs). I don't think reboot stability on AirOS is a good indicator for general stability with OpenWrt on these frequencies. If the devices reboot, that's an indicator of a driver bug. - Felix