From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: eliminate ELEVATOR_INSERT_REQUEUE
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 09:53:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D92E186.5030603@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110329182555.GA22898@infradead.org>
On 2011-03-29 20:25, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Btw, is there any need to actually keep the elv_insert interface?
>
> Itw has two callers in current mainline, two of them hardcode
> ELEVATOR_INSERT_REQUEUE as the reason and could opencode it, and
> the other cases could be merged into __elv_add_request.
Agree, I merged the two and killed elv_insert().
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-30 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-25 15:15 [OOPS] elevator private data for REQ_FLUSH Sergey Senozhatsky
2011-03-25 15:22 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-03-25 15:40 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-03-25 15:50 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-25 18:54 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-03-25 19:50 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-26 4:21 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-03-28 8:23 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-28 22:15 ` [PATCH] block: eliminate ELEVATOR_INSERT_REQUEUE (was: Re: elevator private data for REQ_FLUSH) Mike Snitzer
2011-03-29 11:56 ` [PATCH] block: eliminate ELEVATOR_INSERT_REQUEUE Jens Axboe
2011-03-29 14:18 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-03-29 18:25 ` [PATCH] " Christoph Hellwig
2011-03-30 7:42 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-30 7:53 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2011-03-29 14:13 ` [PATCH] block: eliminate ELEVATOR_INSERT_REQUEUE (was: Re: elevator private data for REQ_FLUSH) Jeff Moyer
2011-03-29 17:54 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-03-30 7:41 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-30 7:57 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-30 7:59 ` [PATCH] block: eliminate ELEVATOR_INSERT_REQUEUE Jens Axboe
2011-03-30 8:02 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-30 10:16 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-30 11:20 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-30 11:23 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-30 11:21 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2011-03-30 11:22 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-30 11:49 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2011-03-30 13:46 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-03-30 13:49 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-30 14:01 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-03-30 14:27 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-30 15:22 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-03-30 15:30 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-30 17:13 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-30 17:32 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-30 17:56 ` Jeff Moyer
2011-03-30 18:12 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-25 15:57 ` [OOPS] elevator private data for REQ_FLUSH Jens Axboe
2011-03-25 16:03 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D92E186.5030603@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markus@trippelsdorf.de \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.